Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun;11(3):136-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF03262729.

Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years

A M Kemoli et al. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: This was to evaluate the influence of two methods of tooth-isolation on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in the primary molars.

Methods: The study was conducted in two rural divisions in Kenya, with 7 operators randomly paired to a group of 8 assistants. A total of 804 children each had one proximal cavity in a primary molar restored using the ART approach. During restorations 2 isolation methods, rubber dam or cotton wool rolls, and 3 brands of glass ionomer cements were used by the operators. The restorations were then followed for a period of 2 years.

Statistics: SPSS 14.0 was used to analyse and relate the data obtained to the method of isolation used.

Results: After 2 years 30.8% of the ART restorations had survived. Higher survival rates of the restorations were obtained when using rubber dam irrespective of the GIC material or the operator.

Conclusion: Generally the survival rate of the proximal restorations in the present study was very low, but the use of rubber dam resulted in a higher survival rate of the restorations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Caries Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):437-44 - PubMed
    1. Int Dent J. 2004 Feb;54(1):42-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dent. 1992 Oct;5(5):277-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Oral Investig. 2000 Sep;4(3):148-52 - PubMed
    1. Oper Dent. 1991 Jul-Aug;16(4):130-5 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources