Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection
- PMID: 20507828
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection
Abstract
The present paper argues for the notion that when attention is spread across the visual field in the first sweep of information through the brain visual selection is completely stimulus-driven. Only later in time, through recurrent feedback processing, volitional control based on expectancy and goal set will bias visual selection in a top-down manner. Here we review behavioral evidence as well as evidence from ERP, fMRI, TMS and single cell recording consistent with stimulus-driven selection. Alternative viewpoints that assume a large role for top-down processing are discussed. It is argued that in most cases evidence supporting top-down control on visual selection in fact demonstrates top-down control on processes occurring later in time, following initial selection. We conclude that top-down knowledge regarding non-spatial features of the objects cannot alter the initial selection priority. Only by adjusting the size of the attentional window, the initial sweep of information through the brain may be altered in a top-down way.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The top-down control of visual selection and how it is linked to the N2pc component.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):100-2; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 21. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20494328 No abstract available.
-
Early top-down attentional modulation in visual processing.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):112-3; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.015. Epub 2010 May 23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20497897 No abstract available.
-
Reentrant processing in attentional guidance--time to abandon old dichotomies.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):109-11; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 May 26. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20507829 No abstract available.
-
A critical evaluation of the disengagement hypothesis.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):103-5; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.012. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20510849 No abstract available.
-
Priming in visual search: a spanner in the works for Theeuwes's bottom-up attention sweeps?Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):114-6; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 Jun 1. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20519127 No abstract available.
-
Is initial visual selection completely stimulus-driven?Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):106-8; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 Jun 2. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20522404 No abstract available.
-
Reevaluating the disengagement hypothesis.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):127-9; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Jun 14. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20542256 No abstract available.
-
Dimension-based attention modulates feed-forward visual processing.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):117-22; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jul 1. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20579624 No abstract available.
-
Why salience is not enough: reflections on top-down selection in vision.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):130-2; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 26. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20580341 Free PMC article.
-
Top-down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):123-6; discussion 133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Jun 17. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010. PMID: 20883842 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
