Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Jul;24(7):1350-6.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.116. Epub 2010 May 27.

Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study

S K Kumar et al. Leukemia. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

This phase 1 study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00507442) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide (VDCR) and to assess the safety and efficacy of this combination in untreated multiple myeloma patients. Cohorts of three to six patients received a cyclophosphamide dosage of 100, 200, 300, 400 or 500 mg/m(2) (on days 1 and 8) plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) (on days 1, 4, 8 and 11), dexamethasone 40 mg (on days 1, 8 and 15) and lenalidomide 15 mg (on days 1-14), for eight 21-day induction cycles, followed by four 42-day maintenance cycles (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, 15 and 22). The MTD was the cyclophosphamide dose below which more than one of six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Twenty-five patients were treated. Two DLTs were seen, of grade 4 febrile neutropenia (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m(2)) and grade 4 herpes zoster despite anti-viral prophylaxis (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)). No cumulative hematological toxicity or thromboembolic episodes were reported. The overall response rate was 96%, including 20% stringent complete response (CR), 40% CR/near-complete response and 68% >or=very good partial response. VDCR is well tolerated and highly active in this population. No MTD was reached; the recommended phase 2 cyclophosphamide dose in VDCR is 500 mg/m(2), which was the highest dose tested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

SKK has a consultancy/advisory relationship, and has received research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Celgene; IF has received honoraria and research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals; SJN has received honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals; PH has a consultancy/advisory relationship with Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Celgene; has received honoraria from Celgene and research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals; RR has a consultancy/advisory relationship with Millennium Pharmaceuticals and has received honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Celgene and Amgen; NC has received research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals; MB has received honoraria from Pfizer, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Cephalon; JLW has received honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Celgene and Ortho Biotech; CG has a consultancy/advisory relationship, and has received honoraria and research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Celgene; AK has stock/ownership interest in Celgene, and has received honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Celgene; DG has a consultancy/advisory relationship with and has received honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals; EAS has a consultancy/advisory relationship with Millennium Pharmaceuticals and has received honoraria from Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Celgene; HS and IJW are employees of Millennium Pharmaceuticals; PGR has a consultancy/advisory role in Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Celgene and has received research funding from Millennium Pharmaceuticals; JG and SVR declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plot (with whiskers showing 10th to 90th percentile) of change in platelet count (a), and neutrophil count (b) over time for patients treated at dose level 5.

References

    1. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111:2516–2520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111:2521–2526. - PubMed
    1. Jagannath S, Durie BG, Wolf JL, Camacho ES, Irwin D, Lutzky J, et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 2 trial of bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone for the frontline treatment of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2009;146:619–626. - PubMed
    1. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Leleu X, Troncy J, Pegourie B, Stoppa AM, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of an IFM phase II study. Haematologica. 2006;91:1498–1505. - PubMed
    1. Harousseau JL, Mathiot C, Attal M, Marit G, Caillot D, Hulin C, et al. Bortezomib/dexamethasone versus VAD as induction prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM): updated data from IFM 2005/01 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:455s. Abstract 8505; updated data presented at the ASH 2008 joint ASH/ASCO symposium.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources