Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May 28:5:44.
doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-44.

Mid-term outcomes for Endoscopic versus Open Vein Harvest: a case control study

Bilal H Kirmani  1 , James B Barnard, Faisal Mourad, Nadene Blakeman, Karen Chetcuti, Joseph Zacharias
Affiliations

Mid-term outcomes for Endoscopic versus Open Vein Harvest: a case control study

Bilal H Kirmani et al. J Cardiothorac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Saphenous vein remains the most common conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting with increasing uptake of minimally invasive harvesting techniques. While Endoscopic Vein Harvest (EVH) has been demonstrated to improve early morbidity compared to Open Vein Harvest (OVH), recent literature suggests that this may be at the expense of graft patency at one year and survival at three years.

Methods: We undertook a retrospective single-centre, single-surgeon, case-control study of EVH (n = 89) and OVH (n = 182). The primary endpoint was death with secondary endpoints including acute coronary syndrome, revascularisation or other major adverse cardiac events. Freedom from angina, wound complications and self-rated health status were also assessed. Where repeat angiography had been performed, this was reviewed.

Results: Both groups were well matched demographically and for peri-operative characteristics. All cause mortality was 2/89 (2%) and 11/182 (6%) in the EVH and OVH groups respectively. This was shown by Cox Log-Rank analysis to be non-significant (p = 0.65), even if adjusting for inpatient mortality (p = 0.74). There was no difference in the rates of freedom from angina (p = 1.00), re-admission (p = 0.78) or need for further anti-anginals (p = 1.00). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of leg wound infections and complications in the endoscopic group (EVH: 7%; OVH: 28%; p = 0.0008) and the skew of high patient self-rated health scores in the EVH group (61% compared to 52% in the open group) approached statistical significance (p = 0.06).

Conclusions: While aware of the limitations of this small retrospective study, we are heartened by the preliminary results and consider our data to be justification for continuing to provide patients the opportunity to have minimally invasive conduit harvest in our centre. More robust evidence is still required to elucidate the implications of endoscopic techniques on conduit patency and patient outcome, but until the results of a large, prospective and randomised trial are available, we believe we can confidently offer our patients the option and benefits of EVH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profile. CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting. EVH = endoscopic vein harvest. OVH = open vein harvest.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan Meier Curve showing all-cause out of hospital mortality.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Survival Rates - Heart Surgery in United Kingdom. http://heartsurgery.cqc.org.uk/Survival.aspx
    1. Allen K, Cheng D, Cohn W, Connolly M, Edgerton J, Falk V, Martin J, Ohtsuka T, Vitali R. Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2005;1(2):51–60. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000196315.32179.82. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carpino PA, Khabbaz KR, Bojar RM, Rastegar H, Warner KG, Murphy RE, Payne DD. Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119(1):69–75. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70219-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reed JF. Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus conventional vein harvesting. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2008;7(4):210–219. doi: 10.1177/1534734608324172. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Markar SR, Kutty R, Edmonds L, Sadat U, Nair S. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19942633 - PubMed