Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov;24(11):2681-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1119-6. Epub 2010 May 29.

Noninvasive detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: a review of the current literature

Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: a review of the current literature

Nellie Bering Zinther et al. Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Adhesions are a well-known and very common complication to surgery. Their extent and severity varies according to type and number of surgeries, use of intraabdominal mesh, and presence of peritonitis. Adhesions cause increased morbidity and mortality, with subsequent socioeconomic consequences. This review aimed to identify existing literature on noninvasive radiologic techniques for identification of intraabdominal adhesions.

Methods: A structured literature search of medical databases was conducted. English literature published until September 2009 and relevant references were included and assessed.

Results: The search identified transabdominal ultrasonography (TAU) and cine magnetic resonance imaging (cine MRI) as relevant tools matching the search criteria. In all, 12 publications concerning TAU and 4 publications concerning cine MRI were identified. All but one of these publications had the methodologic limitation of not being blinded, which influenced the final sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Conclusion: Both TAU and cine MRI seem able to identify intraabdominal adhesions using visceral slide with accuracy of 76% to 92%. Unfortunately, the studies are biased by being nonblinded. Accordingly, a need exists for a systematic well-conducted double-blinded comparative study to validate these radiologic techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Radiology. 2000 Nov;217(2):421-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Aug;80(2):439-42 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2455-61 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1999 May 1;353(9163):1476-80 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;177(1):107-10 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources