Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Nov;30(4):452-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11239-010-0482-4.

Safety and benefits of protamine administration to revert anticoagulation soon after coronary angioplasty. A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Safety and benefits of protamine administration to revert anticoagulation soon after coronary angioplasty. A meta-analysis

Giuseppe De Luca et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Recent studies suggests that bleeding complications are associated with worse clinical outcome and survival among patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Thus, in the last years increasing interests have been focused on strategies to prevent bleeding complications. The administration of protamine after coronary stenting for early sheath removal seems very attractive to minimize local and systemic bleeding complications. Thus, the aim of the current study is to perform a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials evaluating the benefits and safety of protamine administration after coronary angioplasty. The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) from January 1990 to December 2009. The following key words were used: coronary angioplasty, primary angioplasty, coronary stenting, protamine, heparin neutralization, bleeding complications. Primary endpoints were death and major bleeding complications, respectively. Secondary endpoint was myocardial infarction. A total of 5 trials, 2 randomized and 3 non randomized were included in the meta-analysis, involving 6,762 patients (4,913 or 72.6% in the protamine group and 1,949 or 27.4% in the standard group). Protamine administration was not associated with difference in short-term mortality (2.8% vs. 2.7%, OR [95% CI] = 0.97 [0.69-1.37], P = 0.88, p(het) = 1.0), but with a significant reduction in major bleeding complications (2.4% vs. 4.1%, OR [95% CI] = 0.51 [0.37-0.69], P < 0.0001, p(het) = 0.53, NNT = 58.8). No difference was observed myocardial infarction (0.9% vs. 0.8%, OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.63-2.07], P = 0.66, p(het) = 0.89). This meta-analysis shows that protamine administration after percutaneous coronary intervention seems to be safe and associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding complications. Pending the results of larger randomized trials, its use may be considered after coronary angioplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Sep 1;80(5):633-4 - PubMed
    1. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002 Jun;56(2):196-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1896-900 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Aug;60(2):405-10 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2001-15 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources