Predictors of initiating rapid-acting insulin analog using vial/syringe, prefilled pen, and reusable pen devices in patients with type 2 diabetes
- PMID: 20513319
- PMCID: PMC2901030
- DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400307
Predictors of initiating rapid-acting insulin analog using vial/syringe, prefilled pen, and reusable pen devices in patients with type 2 diabetes
Abstract
Background: Limited data are available on the predictors of insulin delivery device choice. This study assessed the patient- and health-care-system-related factors that predict the initiation of one rapid-acting insulin analog (RAIA) delivery system over another.
Methods: A retrospective analysis using a claims database (January 1, 2007, through March 31, 2009) was conducted. Patients were required to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and have >or=12 months of continuous eligibility prior to their first prescription of a RAIA on or after January 1, 2008. The three cohorts in the study were vial/syringe (n = 6820), prefilled pen (n = 5840), and reusable pen (n = 2052). Multiple factors were examined using stepwise logistic regression.
Results: Factors that increased the likelihood of initiating RAIA using prefilled pen versus vial/syringe included endocrinologist visit [odds ratio (OR) = 3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.56, 3.82], prior basal insulin use with pen (OR = 4.85, 95% CI = 4.21, 5.59), and use of >or=1 oral antihyperglycemic agents (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.20, 1.45). Factors that decreased the likelihood included inpatient admission (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.70, 0.83), nursing home visit (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.27), and obesity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.53, 0.83). There were fewer differences between prefilled and reusable pen initiators. Factors that increased the likelihood of initiating with prefilled versus reusable pen included endocrinologist visit (OR = 1.87, CI = 1.50, 2.34) and inpatient admission (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.30, 1.64).
Conclusion: Significant differences in predictors were observed between prefilled pen and vial/syringe initiators. The differences were fewer between prefilled and reusable pen initiators. These differences should be taken into consideration when evaluating outcomes associated with specific insulin delivery systems.
(c) 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.
Similar articles
-
Adherence to premixed insulin in a prefilled pen compared with a vial/syringe in people with diabetes in Singapore.Clin Ther. 2014 Jul 1;36(7):1043-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 7. Clin Ther. 2014. PMID: 24913030
-
A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.Clin Ther. 2003 Nov;25(11):2836-48. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80337-5. Clin Ther. 2003. PMID: 14693308 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of utilization, cost, adherence, and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating rapid-acting insulin analog with prefilled pen versus vial/syringe.J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):75-86. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.546466. Epub 2011 Jan 13. J Med Econ. 2011. PMID: 21231863
-
Overview of insulin delivery pen devices.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):e118-31. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08125. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009. PMID: 19692314 Review.
-
A review of insulin pen devices.Postgrad Med. 2010 May;122(3):81-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.05.2145. Postgrad Med. 2010. PMID: 20463417 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of symposium articles on insulin pen devices and alternative insulin delivery methods.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 May 1;4(3):558-61. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400308. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010. PMID: 20513320 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States. 2007. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2007.pdf.
-
- Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–1589. - PubMed
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–853. - PubMed
-
- The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–986. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical