Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jun;95(6):863-6.
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.023432.

Deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and factor V Leiden: enigma or paradox

Review

Deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and factor V Leiden: enigma or paradox

Javier Corral et al. Haematologica. 2010 Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Role of factor V (FV) on blood coagulation and effect of FV Leiden (FVL). Thrombin (IIa) cleaves FV at R709, R1018, and R1545 to activate FV (FVa). FVa together with factor Xa, forms the prothrombinase complex, which promotes prothrombin (FII) conversion to thrombin on the platelet surface. Thrombin generates the fibrin clot and also activates FXIII, which by means of its transglutaminase activity crosslinks fibrin fibers. Moreover, thrombin also activates the thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI). These two effects contributed to the strength and resistance of the clot. Cleavage of FVa at R506 by activated protein C (APC) and protein S (PS) initiates the inactivation of FVa (FVi). Patients with FV Leiden (FVL) are resistant to FVa inactivation. Therefore, FVL activated has a longer half-life in plasma that results in increased thrombin generation. FV can also be cleaved by APC at R506, resulting in a molecule that acts as an anticoagulant (FVac) by stimulating APC- and PS–mediated inactivation of FVIIIa. FVL carriers also have this anticoagulant mechanism. Both FVL effects certainly contribute to the increased risk of venous thrombosis. However, it is necessary to identify any possible relationship of these two FVL-mediated mechanisms with a potential reduced embolization risk that could explain the minor incidence of pulmonary embolism in FVL-carriers.

Comment on

References

    1. Desmarais S, de Moerloose P, Reber G, Minazio P, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Resistance to activated protein C in an unselected population of patients with pulmonary embolism. Lancet. 1996;347(9012):1374–45. - PubMed
    1. Manten B, Westendorp RGJ, Koster T, Reitsma PH, Rosendaal FR. Risk factor profiles in patients with different clinical manifestations of venous thromboembolism: a focus on the factor V Leiden mutation. Thromb Haemost. 1996;76(4):510–3. - PubMed
    1. Martinelli I, Cattaneo M, Panzeri D, Mannucci PM. Low prevalence of factor V:Q506 in 41 patients with isolated pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(3):440–3. - PubMed
    1. Baglin TP, Brown K, Williamson D, Baker P, Luddington R. Relative risk of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in association with the factor V Leiden in a United Kingdom population. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(6):1219. - PubMed
    1. Leroyer C, Mercier B, Escoffre M, Férec C, Mottier D. Factor V Leiden prevalence in venous thromboembolism patients. Chest. 1997;111(6):1603–6. - PubMed