Maintaining and enhancing gingival architecture in fixed prosthodontics
- PMID: 2051387
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90200-g
Maintaining and enhancing gingival architecture in fixed prosthodontics
Abstract
The long-term success of fixed prosthodontic restorations is greatly dependent upon the health and stability of the surrounding periodontal structures. This article deals with the interrelationship between fixed prosthodontic procedures and the stability and health of the periodontium. The commonly encountered problem of alterations in gingival architecture is examined in relation to tooth preparation as well as soft tissue preparation. In addition, the ability of the provisional restoration to guide soft tissue form is discussed as well as the role of the final restoration in providing long-term tissue maintenance. Key factors such as margin placement, tissue damage during tooth preparation, the role of the provisional restoration, tissue injury during impression procedures, crown contour, pontic design, and embrasure design are covered in detail.
Similar articles
-
Gingival enhancement in fixed prosthodontics. Part I: Clinical findings.J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Jan;65(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90059-6. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. PMID: 2033528 Clinical Trial.
-
Gingival esthetics.J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Jul;64(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90144-2. J Prosthet Dent. 1990. PMID: 2200874 Review.
-
Considerations in fixed prosthodontics.Dent Clin North Am. 1979 Jan;23(1):21-35. Dent Clin North Am. 1979. PMID: 365630
-
Fixed prosthodontics and periodontal health.Dent Clin North Am. 1980 Apr;24(2):317-29. Dent Clin North Am. 1980. PMID: 6988243 No abstract available.
-
Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.Dent Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;58(1):45-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.002. Dent Clin North Am. 2014. PMID: 24286645 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinician- and patient-reported long-term evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant restorations: a 5-year prospective study.Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Dec;15(6):993-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0460-4. Epub 2010 Sep 1. Clin Oral Investig. 2011. PMID: 20809428 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):189-95. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.156043. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015. PMID: 26097353 Free PMC article.
-
Easy Accurate Transfer of the Sculpted Soft Tissue Contours to the Working Cast: A Clinical Tip.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14(Suppl 1):337-40. doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0358-y. Epub 2014 Apr 4. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014. PMID: 26199543 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Porcelain Fused to Metal and Stainless-Steel Crown Following Ultrasonic and Hand Scaling: A Comparative Study.Cureus. 2022 Jul 22;14(7):e27134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27134. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36017283 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):173-179. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_285_18. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019. PMID: 31040552 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources