Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;2(2):69-75.
doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.69. Epub 2010 May 4.

Factors affecting patients' graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Affiliations

Factors affecting patients' graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Hae Seok Koh et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have reported that allografts are acceptable alternatives to autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. Our clinical practice allows patient involvement in graft decision-making. This study examined the patients' preference for graft selection and the factors affecting their decision.

Methods: Patients scheduled to undergo an ACL reconstruction surgery (n = 129) at a university medical center in Korea were enrolled in this study. Information leaflets with graft descriptions were provided prior to hospital admission, and the patients were allowed to choose one of two surgical graft types. The patients were asked to complete a questionnaire that reflected their decision-making processes, and the patients' trends and factors affecting their choice of graft were analyzed based on their responses.

Results: Most patients (54.3%) selected autografts for the ACL reconstruction. The surgeon's explanation was the most important factor affecting the final patient decision followed by the information derived from Internet searches. Patients who derived the majority of their understanding of the graft types from the Internet chose allografts at significantly higher rates.

Conclusions: Patient graft selection is a reasonable way of designating the type of surgical procedure. Most patients selected autografts for their ACL reconstruction. However, patients who performed significant Internet-based research tended to prefer allografts.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Graft; Patient preference; Reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients received an information leaflet containing general ACL graft information with descriptions of a hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior tendon allograft (English version of leaflet).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The patients completed an 11-item questionnaire discussing their graft decisions on hospital admission for surgery (English version of the questionnaire).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Information sources affecting the choice of graft in all patients.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Information sources affecting the choice of graft in the autograft and allograft groups. The proportions of leaflet and internet (*) between the autograft and allograft groups were significantly different (p = 0.003, p = 0.008, respectively).

References

    1. Sherman OH, Banffy MB. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: which graft is best? Arthroscopy. 2004;20(9):974–980. - PubMed
    1. Eriksson E. Auto- or allograft for ACL-reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(6):689. - PubMed
    1. Barber FA. Should allografts be used for routine anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? Arthroscopy. 2003;19(4):421. - PubMed
    1. Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(5):721–732. - PubMed
    1. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J. A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):564–574. - PubMed