Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 14;10(7):2401-7.
doi: 10.1021/nl1004652.

Highly emissive multiexcitons in steady-state photoluminescence of individual "giant" CdSe/CdS Core/Shell nanocrystals

Affiliations

Highly emissive multiexcitons in steady-state photoluminescence of individual "giant" CdSe/CdS Core/Shell nanocrystals

H Htoon et al. Nano Lett. .

Abstract

The development of nanocrystal quantum dots (NQDs) with suppressed nonradiative Auger recombination has been an important goal in colloidal nanostructure research motivated by the needs of prospective applications in lasing devices, light-emitting diodes, and photovoltaic cells. Here, we conduct single-nanocrystal spectroscopic studies of recently developed core-shell NQDs (so-called "giant" NQDs) that comprise a small CdSe core surrounded by a 16-monolayer-thick CdS shell. Using both continuous-wave and pulsed excitation, we observe strong emission features due both to neutral and charged biexcitons, as well as multiexcitons of higher order. The development of pronounced multiexcitonic peaks in steady-state photoluminescence of individual nanocrystals, as well as continuous growth of the emission intensity in the range of high pump levels, point toward a significant suppression of nonradiative Auger decay that normally renders multiexcitons nonemissive. The unusually high multiexciton emission efficiencies in these systems open interesting opportunities for studies of multiexciton phenomena using well-established methods of single-dot spectroscopy, as well as new exciting prospects for applications, that have previously been hampered by nonradiative Auger decay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PL spectra of two individual g-NQDs (‘a’ and ‘c’) measured at progressively increasing pump intensities (indicated in normalized units) of cw 532 nm excitation indicate a transition from single exciton (X1) to biexciton (X2) emission. The dependence of the amplitudes of these features on pump level is shown, respectively, in ‘b’ and ‘d’ (blue circles for X1 and red triangles for X2) together with the spectrally integrated PL signal (black squares).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distributions of spectral shifts (ΔE) of the X2 vs. X1 band (histogram shown in red) and the X*2 vs. X*1 band (histogram shown in blue) derived from the analysis of the PL spectra of ~40 individual g-NQDs plotted in comparison to the expanded view of the ensemble PLE spectrum (black circles). The full ensemble PL and PLE spectra are shown in the inset.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PL spectra of two individual g-NQDs (‘a’ and ‘c’; the same dots as those in Figs. 1c and 1a, respectively) measured at progressively increasing pump intensities (indicated in normalized units) of cw 405 nm excitation that indicate two different types (A and B) of spectral features. The A-type g-NQD shows spectral peaks (in ‘a’) and PL pump-intensity dependences (in ‘b’) that are similar to those observed for cw 532 nm excitation and characteristic of emission from single excitons and biexcitons in neutral dots. The spectral features (in ‘c’) and pump-intensity dependences observed for the B-type g-NQD are consistent with emission from trions and charged biexcitons from charged nanocrystals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Spectral features X2 and X1 in neutral (type-A) nanocrystals are due to emission from biexcitons and single excitons, respectively. The blue-shift of the X2 emission energy with regard to the X1 transition (not shown in the figure) is due to exciton-exciton repulsion, which develops in g-NQDs as a result of imbalance in spatial distributions of electron and hole wave functions. The decay constant of the biexciton (τ2) is likely defined solely by radaitive transitions. In charged (type-B) g-NQDs, photoexcited biexcitons (charged biexcitons) emit due to both the band-edge transition [L1(e) − L1(h)] and the transitions involving a higher energy state [L1(e) − L2(h); shown by the arrow]. In the figure, for the purpose of example, we show a dot which contains an excess hole; however, based on the available data we cannot indentify with certainty the sign of the charge residing in the nanocrystal. Based on measured pump-dependent PL intensity, the decay of the charged biexciton (time constant τ2*) is likely dominated by radiative processes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Time integrated PL spectra of the individual g-NQD measured using pulsed excited 405 nm excitation for different per pulse fluences (indicated in normalized units in the figure). In addition to the X1 and X2 bands, the spectra reveal four more higher-energy peaks (labeled X3 –X6) that are due to emission of triexcitons and other multiexcitons of higher order. (b) Pump-intensity dependence of the X1 (black open circles) and the X2 (blue open squares) features along with the spectrally integrated PL intensity (gray solid circles); dashed and solid lines correspond to linear and quadratic dependences, respectively. At low intensities, the measured dependence for the spectrally integrated PL signal is nearly linear but becomes sub-linear at j > 0.1. A progressive deviation of the measured data from the linear dependence with increasing j indicates that the decay of higher-order multiexcitons is contributed by Auger recombination, which leads to decreasing multiexciton emission yields with increasing exciton multiplicity. (c) PL dynamics measured at the positions of the X2, X3, and X4 features for j = 1. The X2 trace measured for j = 0.07 is also shown for comparison.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klimov VI. Ann Rev Phys Chem. 2007;58:635–673. - PubMed
    1. Klimov VI, McGuire JA, Schaller RD, Rupasov VI. Phys Rev B. 2008;77(19)
    1. Efros AL, Kharchenko VA, Rosen M. Solid State Commun. 1995;93(4):281–284.
    1. Klimov VI, Mikhailovsky AA, Xu S, Malko A, Hollingsworth JA, Leatherdale CA, Eisler HJ, Bawendi MG. Science. 2000;290(5490):314–317. - PubMed
    1. Klimov VI, Ivanov SA, Nanda J, Achermann M, Bezel I, McGuire JA, Piryatinski A. Nature. 2007;447(7143):441–446. - PubMed

Publication types