Clonal resistance analyses of HIV type-1 after failure of therapy with didanosine, lamivudine and tenofovir
- PMID: 20516563
- PMCID: PMC2902251
- DOI: 10.3851/IMP1539
Clonal resistance analyses of HIV type-1 after failure of therapy with didanosine, lamivudine and tenofovir
Abstract
Background: The rapid failure of initial therapy with combinations of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) that exclude zidovudine has not been fully explained by standard virus population analyses of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) drug resistance. We therefore investigated HIV-1 genotype and phenotype at the single genome level in samples from patients on a failing regimen of tenofovir (TNV), didanosine (ddI) and lamivudine (3TC).
Methods: Single genome sequencing was performed on 9 failure samples containing both K65R and M184V mutations by standard genotype, either as wild-type/mutant mixtures (6/9) or as mutant only (3/9). Recombinant clones with different combinations of observed mutations were generated and tested for NRTI susceptibility.
Results: Of the 204 single genome sequences analysed, 50% were K65R/M184V double mutants, 38% were M184V single mutants, 10% were M184I single mutants and only 1% (2 sequences) were K65R single mutants. Phenotypic testing of recombinant clones showed a significant increase in resistance for double mutants: mean fold resistance to abacavir, ddI and TNV was 6.5, 4.3 and 1.6 for K65R/M184V double mutants versus 2.5, 1.9 and 0.6 for M184V single mutants, respectively (P<0.001).
Conclusions: Mutants with K65R and M184V linked on the same genome were the most common HIV-1 variants in samples analysed from patients failing TNV, ddI and 3TC with both mutations detected by standard genotype. The double mutant exhibited reduced susceptibility to all three NRTIs in the regimen. This resistant phenotype, resulting from just two linked point mutations, likely contributes to rapid failure of NRTI combinations that exclude zidovudine.
Similar articles
-
The emergence of drug resistant HIV variants at virological failure of HAART combinations containing efavirenz, tenofovir and lamivudine or emtricitabine within the UK Collaborative HIV Cohort.J Infect. 2014 Jan;68(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Sep 20. J Infect. 2014. PMID: 24055802
-
Molecular basis of antagonism between K70E and K65R tenofovir-associated mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.Antiviral Res. 2007 Sep;75(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 Apr 4. Antiviral Res. 2007. PMID: 17442410 Clinical Trial.
-
Drug-resistance development differs between HIV-1-infected patients failing first-line antiretroviral therapy containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with and without thymidine analogues.HIV Med. 2013 Oct;14(9):571-7. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12044. Epub 2013 May 13. HIV Med. 2013. PMID: 23668660
-
K65R, TAMs and tenofovir.AIDS Rev. 2004 Jan-Mar;6(1):22-33. AIDS Rev. 2004. PMID: 15168738 Review.
-
Quadruple nucleoside therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, abacavir and tenofovir in the treatment of HIV.Antivir Ther. 2007;12(5):695-703. Antivir Ther. 2007. PMID: 17713153 Review.
Cited by
-
The evolution of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in route to acquisition of Q151M multi-drug resistance is complex and involves mutations in multiple domains.Retrovirology. 2011 May 11;8:31. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-8-31. Retrovirology. 2011. PMID: 21569325 Free PMC article.
-
Antiretroviral treatment interruption and loss to follow-up in two HIV cohorts in Australia and Asia: implications for 'test and treat' prevention strategy.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013 Dec;27(12):681-91. doi: 10.1089/apc.2012.0439. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013. PMID: 24320013 Free PMC article.
-
Antiretroviral drug use by individuals living with HIV/AIDS and compliance with the Clinical Protocol and Therapy Guidelines.Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Feb 17;18:eAO4995. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4995. eCollection 2020. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020. PMID: 32074221 Free PMC article.
-
Azvudine, a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor showed good drug combination features and better inhibition on drug-resistant strains than lamivudine in vitro.PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105617. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25144636 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemsek J, Hutcherson P, Harper E. Poor virologic responses and early emergence of resistance in treatment naive, HIV-infected patients receiving a once daily triple nucleoside regimen of didanosine, lamivudine, and tenofovir DF; 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; San Francisco, CA. 2004.
-
- Gallant JE, et al. Early virologic nonresponse to tenofovir, abacavir, and lamivudine in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive subjects. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(11):1921–30. - PubMed
-
- Khanlou H, et al. Early virologic failure in a pilot study evaluating the efficacy of therapy containing once-daily abacavir, lamivudine, and tenofovir DF in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005;19(3):135–40. - PubMed
-
- Landman R, et al. Early virologic failure and rescue therapy of tenofovir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: TONUS study. HIV Clin Trials. 2005;6(6):291–301. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical