Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques
- PMID: 20517080
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb6351
Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques
Abstract
Background: Despite a growing literature on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction, few studies have compared perforator flaps with the more commonly practiced methods. The authors compared four reconstructive techniques and identified factors influencing patient satisfaction.
Methods: All patients undergoing postmastectomy breast reconstruction between 1999 and 2006 at a single academic institution were included in our study. A total of 583 patients with tissue expander/implant, latissimus, pedicle transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM), and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions received a validated questionnaire on satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and sociodemographic data.
Results: Patient response was 75 percent, with 439 completed questionnaires including 87 tissue expander/implant, 116 latissimus, and 119 pedicle TRAM and 117 DIEP flap patients. DIEP patients had the highest level of general satisfaction at 80 percent, and pedicle TRAM patients had the highest level of aesthetic satisfaction at 77 percent (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Health-related quality of life and length of time since surgery were identified as significant covariates influencing patient satisfaction. After logistic regression analysis, autologous reconstruction had significantly higher general and aesthetic satisfaction than implant-based reconstruction (p = 0.017 and p < 0.001). Among the autologous reconstructions, abdominal-based flaps had significantly higher general and aesthetic satisfaction than latissimus flaps (p = 0.011 and p = 0.016). When comparing the abdominal-based reconstructions, general and aesthetic satisfaction were no longer statistically significant between pedicle TRAM and DIEP flaps (p = 0.659 and p = 0.198).
Conclusions: Autologous, abdominal-based reconstructions had the highest satisfaction rates across all four groups. After logistic regression analysis, differences in patient satisfaction between pedicle TRAM and DIEP flap reconstruction were no longer observed. Discussing satisfaction outcomes with patients will help them make educated decisions about breast reconstruction.
Comment in
-
Discussion. Patient satisfaction with mastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jun;125(6):1596-1598. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb5f8b. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20517081 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):380-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d6b. Ann Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22964681
-
Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135328.88101.53. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004. PMID: 15457015
-
Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Sep;106(4):769-76. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200009040-00003. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. PMID: 11007387
-
Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319. Ann Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29369109 Review.
-
Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous (TRAM) or Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flaps: An Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles.Med Sci Monit. 2019 May 12;25:3520-3536. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914665. Med Sci Monit. 2019. PMID: 31079136 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Influencers of Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Apr 12;42(5):NP297-NP311. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab415. Aesthet Surg J. 2022. PMID: 34864860 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 20;32(9):919-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2284. Epub 2014 Feb 18. J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24550418 Free PMC article.
-
A novel pilot study using spatial frequency domain imaging to assess oxygenation of perforator flaps during reconstructive breast surgery.Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep;71(3):308-15. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828b02fb. Ann Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23945533 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Breast sensibility in bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05645-y. Epub 2020 Apr 28. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020. PMID: 32346819 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Take-Back Operations in Breast Reconstruction with Free Lower Abdominal Flaps.Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Nov;42(6):741-5. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.741. Epub 2015 Nov 16. Arch Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26618122 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Keehan S, Sisko A, Truffer C, et al. Health spending projections through 2017: The baby-boom generation is coming to Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w145–w155.
-
- Herzlinger RE. Consumer-Driven Health Care: Implications for Providers, Payers, and Policymakers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2004.
-
- Kane RL. Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Barlett Publishers; 2005.
-
- Ramon Y, Ullmann Y, Moscona R, et al. Aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with immediate breast reconstruction using tissue expansion: A follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:686–691.
-
- Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, Zlatoff P, Rivoire M. Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: A 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1461–1478.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical