The management of an accessory or replaced right hepatic artery during multiorgan retrieval: results of an angiographic study

Abstract

In the presence of anatomical variants such as an accessory or replaced (A/R) right hepatic artery (RHA), a conflict of interest can arise during organ retrieval between liver and pancreatic teams. This angiographic study examines the anatomy of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA), its relation to the A/R RHA, and the implications for the use of livers and pancreases from multiorgan donors. Gastrointestinal angiograms performed in our institution for unrelated indications were reviewed, and the relevant arteries, their diameters, the distances between origins, the time at which variants were found, and the blood supply to relevant solid organs were recorded. A review of 122 angiograms identified 100 patients in whom both the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the celiac axis were cannulated synchronously; these patients composed our study cohort. The IPDA was identified in 95% of the cases. There were 8 patients with a replaced RHA and 4 with an accessory RHA. In all 12, the IPDA had an SMA origin; 3 of these shared a common origin with the A/R RHA on the SMA. In the rest, the mean distance between them was 29 mm (range = 17.8-48.3 mm). All anomalous arteries found were segmental vessels. In conclusion, the A/R RHA incidence in our series was 12%, and no case had an IPDA originating from the A/R RHA. Separate accessory RHA and IPDA origins potentially allow an uncompromised accessory RHA (with its Carrel patch) without risk of prejudice to the pancreatic graft if retrieval is accurately performed. Rarely (3%), there is a common origin between the A/R RHA and the IPDA, and back-bench reconstruction would be required to allow the use of both the liver and pancreas.