Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Aug;48(8):2991-4.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02220-09. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

Evaluation of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for typing a polyclonal hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus population in an area where such infections are endemic

Belinda Rivero-Pérez  1 , Eduardo Pérez-Roth, Sebastián Méndez-Alvarez
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for typing a polyclonal hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus population in an area where such infections are endemic

Belinda Rivero-Pérez et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) was performed with 292 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates previously characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing. Quantitative correspondence analyses showed the best correlation between data when an >or=80% cutoff was applied to MLVA. We confirmed the validity of MLVA for identification of related strains in a polyclonal MRSA population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Classification of the Iberian clone (PFGE-A1/ST247-IA) (A) and the EMRSA-16 clone (PFGE-B1/ST36-II) (B) into different MLVA types and subtypes depending on the cutoff criterion (a, 1 band; b, 80% relatedness; c, 70% relatedness) and relationships to the other PFGE subtypes. The gel images were analyzed with InfoQuest software, version 4.5 (Bio-Rad).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramson, M. A., and D. J. Sexton. 1999. Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:408-411. - PubMed
    1. Carriço, J. A., C. Silva Costa, J. Melo-Cristino, F. R. Pinto, H. De Lencastre, J. S. Almeida, and M. Ramirez. 2006. Illustration of a common framework for relating multiple typing methods by application to macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2524-2532. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaberny, I. F., F. Schwab, S. Ziesing, S. Suerbaum, and P. Gastmeier. 2008. Impact of routine surgical ward and intensive care unit admission surveillance cultures on hospital-wide nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital: an interrupted time-series analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62:1422-1429. - PubMed
    1. Crisóstomo, M. I., H. Westh, A. Tomasz, M. Chung, D. C. Oliveira, and H. de Lencastre. 2001. The evolution of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: similarity of genetic backgrounds in historically early methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates and contemporary epidemic clones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:9865-9870. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crossley, K., B. Landsman, and D. Zaske. 1979. An outbreak of infections caused by strains of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin and aminoglycosides. II. Epidemiologic studies. J. Infect. Dis. 139:280-287. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms