Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Sep;95(9):703-10.
doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.180836. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

Patient characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality in children following tracheotomy

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patient characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality in children following tracheotomy

Jay G Berry et al. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify children at risk for in-hospital mortality following tracheotomy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: 25 746 876 US hospitalisations for children within the Kids' Inpatient Database 1997, 2000, 2003 and 2006.

Participants: 18 806 hospitalisations of children ages 0-18 years undergoing tracheotomy, identified from ICD-9-CM tracheotomy procedure codes.

Main outcome measure: Mortality during the initial hospitalisation when tracheotomy was performed in relation to patient demographic and clinical characteristics (neuromuscular impairment (NI), chronic lung disease, upper airway anomaly, prematurity, congenital heart disease, upper airway infection and trauma) identified with ICD-9-CM codes.

Results: Between 1997 and 2006, mortality following tracheotomy ranged from 7.7% to 8.5%. In each year, higher mortality was observed in children undergoing tracheotomy who were aged <1 year compared with children aged 1-4 years (mortality range: 10.2-13.1% vs 1.1-4.2%); in children with congenital heart disease, compared with children without congenital heart disease (13.1-18.7% vs 6.2-7.1%) and in children with prematurity, compared with children who were not premature (13.0-19.4% vs 6.8-7.3%). Lower mortality was observed in children with an upper airway anomaly compared with children without an upper airway anomaly (1.5-5.1% vs 9.1-10.3%). In 2006, the highest mortality (40.0%) was observed in premature children with NI and congenital heart disease, who did not have an upper airway anomaly.

Conclusions: Congenital heart disease, prematurity, the absence of an upper airway anomaly and age <1 year were characteristics associated with higher mortality in children following tracheotomy. These findings may assist provider communication with children and families regarding early prognosis following tracheotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The bivariate OR (95% CI) of in-hospital mortality associated with each clinical characteristic from each year. The ORs represent the odds of mortality in the presence versus the absence of each characteristic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In-hospital mortality for each node in the classification and regression tree (CART) partition analyses for tracheotomy operations performed in the year 2006. The p values indicate the significance of differences in mortality observed at each node.

References

    1. Berry JG, Lieu TA, Forbes PW, et al. Hospital volumes for common pediatric specialty operations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:38–43. - PubMed
    1. Lewis CW, Carron JD, Perkins JA, et al. Tracheotomy in pediatric patients: a national perspective. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:523–9. - PubMed
    1. Berry JG, Graham DA, Graham RJ, et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes and hospital resource use of children after tracheotomy. Pediatrics. 2009;124:563–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkins DB, Williams EH. Tracheostomy in infants and young children. Laryngoscope. 1976;86:331–40. - PubMed
    1. Primuharsa Putra SH, Wong CY, Hazim MY, et al. Paediatric tracheostomy in Hospital University Kebangsaan Malaysia – a changing trend. Med J Malaysia. 2006;61:209–13. - PubMed

Publication types