An in-depth study of long-term users of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Implications for clinical use of TENS
- PMID: 2052389
- DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90089-G
An in-depth study of long-term users of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Implications for clinical use of TENS
Abstract
This in-depth study examines the relationships between patient, stimulator and outcome variables in a large number of chronic pain patients utilising TENS on a long-term basis. 179 patients completed a TENS questionnaire designed to record age, sex, cause and site of pain and TENS treatment regime. Of these 179 patients, 107 attended our research unit for assessment of the electrical characteristics of TENS during self-administered treatment. Although a remarkable lack of correlation between patient, stimulator and outcome variables was found to exist, the analysis revealed much information of importance: 47% of patients found TENS reduced their pain by more than half; TENS analgesia was rapid both in onset (less than 0.5 h in 75% patients) and in offset (less than 0.5 h in 51% patients); one-third of patients utilised TENS for over 61 h/week; pulse frequencies between 1 and 70 Hz were utilised by 75% of patients; 44% of patients benefitted from burst mode stimulation. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Analgesic effects of different frequencies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cold-induced pain in normal subjects.Pain. 1989 Nov;39(2):231-236. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90010-9. Pain. 1989. PMID: 2594401
-
The consistency of pulse frequencies and pulse patterns of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) used by chronic pain patients.Pain. 1991 Mar;44(3):231-234. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90090-K. Pain. 1991. PMID: 2052390
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment outcome in long-term users.Clin J Pain. 1996 Sep;12(3):201-14. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199609000-00008. Clin J Pain. 1996. PMID: 8866161
-
[Mechanisms and applications of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in analgesia].Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2017 Jun 25;69(3):325-334. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2017. PMID: 28638926 Review. Chinese.
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness.J Pain. 2003 Apr;4(3):109-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434. J Pain. 2003. PMID: 14622708 Review.
Cited by
-
Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 14;57(4):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040378. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 33919821 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study).BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e051073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35144946 Free PMC article.
-
Esophageal visceral pain sensitivity: effects of TENS and correlation with manometric findings.Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Aug;43(8):1621-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1018886309364. Dig Dis Sci. 1998. PMID: 9724141
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18843638 Free PMC article.
-
Management of fibromyalgia: what are the best treatment choices?Drugs. 2002;62(4):577-92. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262040-00003. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 11893227 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical