Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May 28:10:e41.

Anatomical landmarks for safe elevation of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a cadaveric study

Affiliations

Anatomical landmarks for safe elevation of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a cadaveric study

Saeed Chowdhry et al. Eplasty. .

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction techniques have focused increasingly on using autologous tissue, with emphasis being placed on employing muscle sparing adipocutaneous flaps to reduce abdominal wall complications such as hernias, bulges, weakness, and length of hospital stay. The result has been the emergence of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction. Isolating perforator vessels challenges most surgeons. We describe surface anatomical landmarks to predict the location of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and its perforators to aid in the efficient elevation of this flap.

Methods: Ten fresh hemi-abdomens were dissected with loupe magnification. The DIEA and its perforators were identified, and measurements in relation to the rectus muscle, xiphoid, umbilicus, and pubis were taken. Statistical analysis was undertaken to determine distance ratios to account for variance in patient size.

Results: Average distance from the xiphoid to umbilicus was 18.2 +/- 1.27 cm. The distance from the umbilicus to pubis was 14.9 +/- 2.3 cm. The vertical distance from the umbilicus to the DRJ (DIEA rtctus junction) was 10.45 +/- 1.58 cm, and the vertical distance from the level of the umbilicus to where the first DIEA perforator traverses the RAM was 7.4 +/- 1.64 cm. The distance between the umbilicus and the DRJ is approximately 0.7 times the distance between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis. The distance between the umbilicus and the first perforator is approximately 0.5 times the distance between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis.

Conclusions: Knowledge of anatomical landmarks can aid the surgeon in more efficiently harvesting the DIEP flap. Surface landmarks along the abdominal midline coupled with normalizing ratios can aid surgeons in predicting the location of the DIEA and its first perforator. The DIEA crosses the rectus at approximately two thirds of the distance between the umbilicus and pubis, and the first perforator can reliably be located at one half of this distance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A dissection of the rectus muscle, the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) rectus junction (DRJ), and the DIEA. Note the location of where the DIEA enters the rectus muscle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A dissection of the posterior aspect of the rectus muscle and the DIEA and its branching pattern.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A dissection with the perforators marked.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A schematic demonstrating the location of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA), DIEA rectus junction (DRJ), and first perforator. Note the average distance from the umbilicus to the level of the first perforator and DRJ.

Similar articles

References

    1. Rozen W-M, Ashton M-W, Pan WR, Taylor GI. Raising perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: the intramuscular anatomy of the DIEA. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1443–9. - PubMed
    1. Nano M-T, Gill P-G, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Carter N, Winefield HR. Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit. Aust N Z J Surg. 2005;75:445–3. - PubMed
    1. Allen R-J. DIEP versus TRAM for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:466–75. - PubMed
    1. Chen M-C, Halvorson E-G, Disa JJ, et al. Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1477–82. - PubMed
    1. Kroll S-S, Sharma S, Koutz C, et al. Postoperative morphine requirements of free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:338–41. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources