An automated image-based method of 3D subject-specific body segment parameter estimation for kinetic analyses of rapid movements
- PMID: 20524742
- DOI: 10.1115/1.4000155
An automated image-based method of 3D subject-specific body segment parameter estimation for kinetic analyses of rapid movements
Abstract
Accurate subject-specific body segment parameters (BSPs) are necessary to perform kinetic analyses of human movements with large accelerations, or no external contact forces or moments. A new automated topographical image-based method of estimating segment mass, center of mass (CM) position, and moments of inertia is presented. Body geometry and volume were measured using a laser scanner, then an automated pose and shape registration algorithm segmented the scanned body surface, and identified joint center (JC) positions. Assuming the constant segment densities of Dempster, thigh and shank masses, CM locations, and moments of inertia were estimated for four male subjects with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 19.7-38.2. The subject-specific BSP were compared with those determined using Dempster and Clauser regression equations. The influence of BSP and BMI differences on knee and hip net forces and moments during a running swing phase were quantified for the subjects with the smallest and largest BMIs. Subject-specific BSP for 15 body segments were quickly calculated using the image-based method, and total subject masses were overestimated by 1.7-2.9%.When compared with the Dempster and Clauser methods, image-based and regression estimated thigh BSP varied more than the shank parameters. Thigh masses and hip JC to thigh CM distances were consistently larger, and each transverse moment of inertia was smaller using the image-based method. Because the shank had larger linear and angular accelerations than the thigh during the running swing phase, shank BSP differences had a larger effect on calculated intersegmental forces and moments at the knee joint than thigh BSP differences did at the hip. It was the net knee kinetic differences caused by the shank BSP differences that were the largest contributors to the hip variations. Finally, BSP differences produced larger kinetic differences for the subject with larger segment masses, suggesting that parameter accuracy is more important for studies focused on overweight populations. The new image-based BSP estimation method described in this paper addressed the limitations of currently used geometric and regression methods by using exact limb geometry to determine subject-specific parameters. BSP differences have the largest effect on kinetic analyses of motions with large limb accelerations, for joints farther along the kinematic chain from the known forces and moments, and for subjects with larger limb masses or BMIs.
Similar articles
-
Improving net joint torque calculations through a two-step optimization method for estimating body segment parameters.J Biomech Eng. 2009 Jan;131(1):011007. doi: 10.1115/1.3005155. J Biomech Eng. 2009. PMID: 19045923
-
The impact of adding trunk motion to the interpretation of the role of joint moments during normal walking.J Biomech. 2007;40(16):3563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.031. Epub 2007 Sep 4. J Biomech. 2007. PMID: 17765906
-
Bottom-up estimation of joint moments during manual lifting using orientation sensors instead of position sensors.J Biomech. 2010 May 7;43(7):1432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Mar 1. J Biomech. 2010. PMID: 20189574
-
Detection of knee unlock during stance by accelerometry.IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996 Dec;4(4):395-402. doi: 10.1109/86.547941. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996. PMID: 8973965 Review.
-
Human morphology: its role in the mechanics of movement.J Biomech. 1993;26 Suppl 1:81-94. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90081-o. J Biomech. 1993. PMID: 8505355 Review.
Cited by
-
Experimental recommendations for estimating lower extremity loading based on joint and activity.J Biomech. 2021 Oct 11;127:110688. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110688. Epub 2021 Aug 24. J Biomech. 2021. PMID: 34461365 Free PMC article.
-
Subject-specific trunk segmental masses prediction for musculoskeletal models using artificial neural networks.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Sep;62(9):2757-2768. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03100-4. Epub 2024 May 2. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024. PMID: 38693326
-
Development of the Biomechanical Technologies for the Modeling of Major Segments of the Human Body: Linking the Past with the Present.Biology (Basel). 2020 Nov 13;9(11):399. doi: 10.3390/biology9110399. Biology (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33202728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accelerometry-based prediction of movement dynamics for balance monitoring.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Sep;50(9):925-36. doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0940-6. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012. PMID: 22802142
-
Subject-specific body segment parameter estimation using 3D photogrammetry with multiple cameras.PeerJ. 2015 Mar 10;3:e831. doi: 10.7717/peerj.831. eCollection 2015. PeerJ. 2015. PMID: 25780778 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources