Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jun 4:9:27.
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-27.

Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Drive time to cardiac rehabilitation: at what point does it affect utilization?

Janette Brual et al. Int J Health Geogr. .

Abstract

Background: A 30 minute drive time threshold has often been cited as indicative of accessible health services. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a chronic disease management program designed to enhance and maintain cardiovascular health, and geographic barriers to utilization are often cited. The purpose of this study was to empirically test the drive time threshold for CR utilization.

Methods: A prospective study, using a multi-level design of coronary artery disease outpatients nested within 97 cardiologists. Participants completed a baseline sociodemographic survey, and reported CR referral, enrollment and participation in a second survey 9 months later. CR utilization was verified with CR sites. Geographic information systems were used to generate drive times at 60, 80 and 100% of the speed limit to the closest CR site from participants' homes, to take into consideration various traffic conditions. Bivariate analysis was used to test for differences in CR referral, enrollment and degree of participation by drive time. Logistic regression was used to test drive time increments where significant differences were found.

Results: Drive times were generated for 1209 outpatients. Overall, CR referral was verified for 523 (43.3%) outpatients, with verified enrollment for 444 (36.7%) participating in a mean of 86.4 +/- 25.7% of prescribed sessions. There were significant differences in CR referral and enrollment by drive time (ps < .01), but not degree of participation. Logistic regression analysis (ps < .001) revealed that the drive time threshold at 80% of the posted speed limit for physician referral may be 60 minutes (OR = .26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.55), and the threshold for patient CR enrollment may also be 60 minutes (OR = .11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.33).

Conclusions: Physicians may be taking geography into consideration when referring patients to CR. Empirical consideration also reveals that patients are significantly less likely to enroll in CR where they must drive 60 minutes or more to the closest program. Once enrolled, distance has no significant effect on degree of participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant Recruitment and CR Participation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spatial distribution of participants and CR sites in the Southern corridor of Ontario.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. International Mortality Data. 2001.
    1. Brown A, Taylor R, Noorani H, Stone J, Skidmore B. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for coronary artery disease: a systematic clinical and economic review. 2003. Technology Report no. 34.
    1. Ades PA. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. New Eng J Med. 2001;345:892–902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra001529. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boulay P, Prud'homme D. Health-care consumption and recurrent myocardial infarction after 1 year of conventional treatment versus short- and long-term cardiac rehabilitation. Prev Med. 2004;38:586–593. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, Skidmore B, Stone JA, Thompson DR, Oldridge N. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116:682–692. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources