Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;38(Web Server issue):W35-40.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq415. Epub 2010 Jun 4.

Multi-Harmony: detecting functional specificity from sequence alignment

Affiliations

Multi-Harmony: detecting functional specificity from sequence alignment

Bernd W Brandt et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Many protein families contain sub-families with functional specialization, such as binding different ligands or being involved in different protein-protein interactions. A small number of amino acids generally determine functional specificity. The identification of these residues can aid the understanding of protein function and help finding targets for experimental analysis. Here, we present multi-Harmony, an interactive web sever for detecting sub-type-specific sites in proteins starting from a multiple sequence alignment. Combining our Sequence Harmony (SH) and multi-Relief (mR) methods in one web server allows simultaneous analysis and comparison of specificity residues; furthermore, both methods have been significantly improved and extended. SH has been extended to cope with more than two sub-groups. mR has been changed from a sampling implementation to a deterministic one, making it more consistent and user friendly. For both methods Z-scores are reported. The multi-Harmony web server produces a dynamic output page, which includes interactive connections to the Jalview and Jmol applets, thereby allowing interactive analysis of the results. Multi-Harmony is available at http://www.ibi.vu.nl/ programs/shmrwww.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Validation results for the SH and mR methods. ProteinKeys, PROUST-II, SDPpred v.2 and Xdet are shown for comparison. Results obtained by the different methods were averaged over all data sets weighted by the number of positives. (A) Box plots showing the distribution (as minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and maximum) of ranks of positive sites. Lower is better. (B) Precision/recall (PR) curves showing the relative performance of the methods at different coverage (recall). Higher is better.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
An example of the multi-Harmony output. (A) The main output table, sorted by SH score and filtered on SH score (formula image0.5) and high mR weight (formula image0.8). Only ALA278 at position 17 in the alignment is not a confirmed functional residue. The columns with arrows can be sorted. Most of these columns can also be filtered to display only those alignment positions that satisfy the user-supplied thresholds. (B) The output view in Jalview. Groups are outlined in the alignment and filtered positions (from the output table) are marked in the annotation track ‘Filtered 1’ with a tooltip detailing the filter like ‘Positions passing criteria [score formula image0.5; weight formula image0.8] are indicated’. (C) View of the 3D context using Jmol with the protein coloured by mR weights, and filtered residues (from the output table) labelled and highlighted as space-filling spheres. Colouring by SH scores is also possible.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Whisstock JC, Lesk AM. Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2003;36:307–340. - PubMed
    1. del Sol A, Pazos F, Valencia A. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;326:1289–1302. - PubMed
    1. Kalinina OV, Mironov AA, Gelfand MS, Rakhmaninova AB. Automated selection of positions determining functional specificity of proteins by comparative analysis of orthologous groups in protein families. Protein Sci. 2004;13:443–456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donald JE, Shakhnovich EI. Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:4455–4465. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pirovano W, Feenstra KA, Heringa J. Sequence comparison by sequence harmony identifies subtype-specific functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:6540–6548. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types