Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-22.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.310.

Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative

Affiliations

Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative

Ronald C Kessler et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Jun.

Erratum in

  • Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):62

Abstract

Data are reported on the background and performance of the K6 screening scale for serious mental illness (SMI) in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. The K6 is a six-item scale developed to provide a brief valid screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) SMI based on the criteria in the US ADAMHA Reorganization Act. Although methodological studies have documented good K6 validity in a number of countries, optimal scoring rules have never been proposed. Such rules are presented here based on analysis of K6 data in nationally or regionally representative WMH surveys in 14 countries (combined N = 41,770 respondents). Twelve-month prevalence of DSM-IV SMI was assessed with the fully-structured WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Nested logistic regression analysis was used to generate estimates of the predicted probability of SMI for each respondent from K6 scores, taking into consideration the possibility of variable concordance as a function of respondent age, gender, education, and country. Concordance, assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was generally substantial (median 0.83; range 0.76-0.89; inter-quartile range 0.81-0.85). Based on this result, optimal scaling rules are presented for use by investigators working with the K6 scale in the countries studied.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baggaley R.F., Ganaba R., Filippi V., Kere M., Marshall T., Sombie I., Storeng K.T., Patel V. (2007). Detecting depression after pregnancy: the validity of the K10 and K6 in Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health, 12, 1225–1229, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐3156.2007.01906.x - PubMed
    1. Baillie A.J. (2005). Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress Scale (k10). Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 40, 743–748, DOI: 10.1007/s00127‐005‐0935‐9 - PubMed
    1. Burnham K.B., Anderson D.R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res, 33, 261–304, DOI: 10.1177/0049124104268644
    1. Colpe L.J., Barker P.G., Karg R.S., Batts K.R., Morton K.B., Gfroerer J.C., Stolzenberg S.J., Cunningham D.B., First M.B., Aldworth J. (2010). The National Survey on Drug Use and Health Mental Health Surveillance Study: calibration study design and field procedures. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 19(Suppl. 1), 36–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coyne J.C., Thompson R., Racioppo M.W. (2001). Validity and efficiency of screening for history of depression by self‐report. Psychol Assessment, 13, 163–170, DOI: 10.1037/I040‐3590.13.2.163 - PubMed

Publication types