Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative
- PMID: 20527002
- PMCID: PMC3659799
- DOI: 10.1002/mpr.310
Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative
Erratum in
- Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):62
Abstract
Data are reported on the background and performance of the K6 screening scale for serious mental illness (SMI) in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. The K6 is a six-item scale developed to provide a brief valid screen for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) SMI based on the criteria in the US ADAMHA Reorganization Act. Although methodological studies have documented good K6 validity in a number of countries, optimal scoring rules have never been proposed. Such rules are presented here based on analysis of K6 data in nationally or regionally representative WMH surveys in 14 countries (combined N = 41,770 respondents). Twelve-month prevalence of DSM-IV SMI was assessed with the fully-structured WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Nested logistic regression analysis was used to generate estimates of the predicted probability of SMI for each respondent from K6 scores, taking into consideration the possibility of variable concordance as a function of respondent age, gender, education, and country. Concordance, assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was generally substantial (median 0.83; range 0.76-0.89; inter-quartile range 0.81-0.85). Based on this result, optimal scaling rules are presented for use by investigators working with the K6 scale in the countries studied.
References
-
- Baggaley R.F., Ganaba R., Filippi V., Kere M., Marshall T., Sombie I., Storeng K.T., Patel V. (2007). Detecting depression after pregnancy: the validity of the K10 and K6 in Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health, 12, 1225–1229, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐3156.2007.01906.x - PubMed
-
- Baillie A.J. (2005). Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress Scale (k10). Social Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 40, 743–748, DOI: 10.1007/s00127‐005‐0935‐9 - PubMed
-
- Burnham K.B., Anderson D.R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res, 33, 261–304, DOI: 10.1177/0049124104268644
-
- Colpe L.J., Barker P.G., Karg R.S., Batts K.R., Morton K.B., Gfroerer J.C., Stolzenberg S.J., Cunningham D.B., First M.B., Aldworth J. (2010). The National Survey on Drug Use and Health Mental Health Surveillance Study: calibration study design and field procedures. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 19(Suppl. 1), 36–48. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Coyne J.C., Thompson R., Racioppo M.W. (2001). Validity and efficiency of screening for history of depression by self‐report. Psychol Assessment, 13, 163–170, DOI: 10.1037/I040‐3590.13.2.163 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- R01 DA016558/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States
- U01-MH60220/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R03 TW006481/TW/FIC NIH HHS/United States
- U01 MH060220/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R13-MH066849/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH070884/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH059575/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R13 MH066849/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01-MH059575/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH069864/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01-MH61905/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01MH070884/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01 MH061905/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- R01-MH069864/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States
- K05 DA015799/DA/NIDA NIH HHS/United States
- R03-TW006481/TW/FIC NIH HHS/United States
