Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug;7(4):214-35.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00682.x. Epub 2010 May 28.

Care of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients

Affiliations
Review

Care of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients

Christine A Chrisman. Int Wound J. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to provide a literature synthesis on current wound care practices for the management of chronic wounds in palliative care and end-of-life patients, focusing on the control of wound-related symptoms for comfort and improved quality of life. These wounds included pressure ulcers, venous and arterial leg ulcers, diabetic ulcers and fungating malignant wounds. Wound-related symptoms included pain, exudate, malodour, infection, bleeding, dressing comfort and negative psychological and social functioning. Best care wound practices were formulated for each wound type to ease suffering based on the literature review. Although symptom management strategies for comfort may work in tandem with healing interventions, it is important to recognise when efforts towards wound closure may become unrealistic or burdensome for the patient at end of life. Thus, unique aspects of palliative wound care feature clinical indicators for early recognition of delayed healing, quality of life measurement tools related to chronic wounds, and comfort care strategies that align with patient wishes and realistic expectations for wound improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rating system for level and quality of evidence.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Complexity of wound healing. Reproduced with permission from Ref. .
Figure 3
Figure 3
National pressure ulcer advisor panel pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). Reproduced with permission from Ref. .

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care . Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, 2nd edn, 2009. National Consensus Project, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. URL http://www.nationalconsensusproject.org/Guidelines_download.asp‐8k‐cached [accessed 29 June 2009].
    1. The World Health Organization . The World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL)‐BREF. 2004, 1–5. URL http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research/tools/whoqolbref/en [access ed 29 June 2009].
    1. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement . Health care order set: palliative care. November 2007. URL http://www.icsi.org [accessed 20 May 2009].
    1. Alvarez OM, Meehan M, Ennis W, Thomas DR, Ferris FD, Kennedy KL, Rogers R, Bradley M, Baker JJ, Fernandez‐Obregon A, Rodeheaver G. Chronic wounds: palliative management for the frail population. Wounds 2002;14(8 Suppl): 4S–27S.
    1. Brown G. Long‐term outcomes of full‐thickness pressure ulcers: healing and mortality. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003;49(10):42–50. - PubMed

MeSH terms