Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Jun 7:10:317.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-317.

HIV prevalence among female sex workers, drug users and men who have sex with men in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

HIV prevalence among female sex workers, drug users and men who have sex with men in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Monica Malta et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The Brazilian response towards AIDS epidemic is well known, but the absence of a systematic review of vulnerable populations horizontal line men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW), and drug users (DU) remains a main gap in the available literature. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing HIV prevalence among MSM, FSW and DU, calculating a combined pooled prevalence and summarizing factors associated the pooled prevalence for each group.

Methods: Nine electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, AIDSLINE, AMED, CINAHL, TOXNET, SciELO, and ISI-Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed papers published in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese, from 1999 to 2009. To be included in the review, studies had to measure HIV prevalence and/or incidence as the primary outcome among at least one specific population under analysis.

Results: The studies targeting the three populations analyzed mostly young participants aged 30 years or less. Among FSW, eight studies were selected (3,625 participants), consistently identifying higher condom use with sexual clients than with occasional and stable partners. The combined HIV prevalence for FSW was 6.2 (95% CI: 4.4-8.3). Ten studies targeting MSM were identified (6,475 participants). Unprotected anal intercourse was commonly reported on those studies, but with great variability according to the nature of the relationship - stable vs. occasional sex partners--and sexual practice--receptive vs. insertive anal sex. Pooled HIV prevalence for MSM was 13.6 (95% CI: 8.2-20.2). Twenty nine studies targeting DU were identified (13,063 participants). Those studies consistently identified injection drug use and syringe/needle sharing as key predictors of HIV-infection, as well as engagement in sex work and male-to-male sex. The combined HIV prevalence across studies targeting DU was 23.1 (95% CI: 16.7-30.2).

Conclusions: FSW, MSM and DU from Brazil have a much risk of acquiring HIV infection compared to the general population, among which HIV prevalence has been relatively low (~0.6%). Those vulnerable populations should be targeted by focused prevention strategies that provide accurate information, counseling and testing, as well as concrete means to foster behavior change (e.g. access to condoms, drug abuse treatment, and clean syringes in the case of active injecting drug users), tailored to gender and culture-specific needs. Programs that provide these services need to be implemented on public health services throughout the country, in order to decrease the vulnerability of those populations to HIV infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram of Studies Included in Analysis, CSW.
Figure 2
Figure 2
a. Pooled Proportion of HIV Prevalence among CSW, all studies* b. Pooled Proportion of HIV Prevalence among CSW, 7 studies*.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow Diagram of Studies Included in Analysis, MSM.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pooled Proportion of HIV Prevalence among MSM.*
Figure 5
Figure 5
Flow Diagram of Studies Included in Analysis, IDU and DU.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Pooled Proportion of HIV Prevalence among DU/IDU.*
Figure 7
Figure 7
a. Pooled Proportion of HIV Prevalence among DU/IDU - Pre-HAART* b. Pooled Proportion of HIV Prevalence among DU/IDU - Pos-HAART*.

References

    1. World Health Organization/Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (WHO/UNAIDS) 2008 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: WHO and UNAIDS; 2008. p. 9.
    1. World Health Organization/Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (WHO/UNAIDS) 2009 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. Geneva: WHO and UNAIDS; 2009.
    1. Grassly NC, Garnett GP. The future of the HIV pandemic. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:378–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spire B, de Zoysa I, Himmich H. HIV prevention: What have we learned from community experiences in concentrated epidemics? J Int AIDS Soc. 2008;11:5. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-11-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Des Jarlais DC, Arasteh K, Semaan S, Wood E. HIV among injecting drug users: current epidemiology, biologic markers, respondent-driven sampling, and supervised-injection facilities. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009;4:308–13. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32832bbc6f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types