Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 8:4:13.
doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-4-13.

The Child Behaviour Assessment Instrument: development and validation of a measure to screen for externalising child behavioural problems in community setting

Affiliations

The Child Behaviour Assessment Instrument: development and validation of a measure to screen for externalising child behavioural problems in community setting

Diana C Samarakkody et al. Int J Ment Health Syst. .

Abstract

Background: In Sri Lanka, behavioural problems have grown to epidemic proportions accounting second highest category of mental health problems among children. Early identification of behavioural problems in children is an important pre-requisite of the implementation of interventions to prevent long term psychiatric outcomes. The objectives of the study were to develop and validate a screening instrument for use in the community setting to identify behavioural problems in children aged 4-6 years.

Methods: An initial 54 item questionnaire was developed following an extensive review of the literature. A three round Delphi process involving a panel of experts from six relevant fields was then undertaken to refine the nature and number of items and created the 15 item community screening instrument, Child Behaviour Assessment Instrument (CBAI). Validation study was conducted in the Medical Officer of Health area Kaduwela, Sri Lanka and a community sample of 332 children aged 4-6 years were recruited by two stage randomization process. The behaviour status of the participants was assessed by an interviewer using the CBAI and a clinical psychologist following clinical assessment concurrently. Criterion validity was appraised by assessing the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values at the optimum screen cut off value. Construct validity of the instrument was quantified by testing whether the data of validation study fits to a hypothetical model. Face and content validity of the CBAI were qualitatively assessed by a panel of experts. The reliability of the instrument was assessed by internal consistency analysis and test-retest methods in a 15% subset of the community sample.

Results: Using the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis the CBAI score of >16 was identified as the cut off point that optimally differentiated children having behavioural problems, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.96) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI = 0.75-0.87). The Cronbach's alpha exceeded Nunnaly's criterion of 0.7 for items related to inattention, aggression and impaired social interaction.

Conclusions: Preliminary data obtained from the study indicate that the Child Behaviour Assessment Instrument is a valid and reliable screening instrument for early identification of young children at risk of behavioural problems in the community setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve of CBAI score in the sample.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Caring for children and adolescents with mental disorders; Setting WHO directions. Geneva. 2003.
    1. Perera H, Perera R. User satisfaction in a child mental health service: implications for practice. Ceylon Medical Journal. 1998;44:185–190. - PubMed
    1. Keenan K, Shaw D, Dellliquadri E, Giovanneli J, Walsh B. Evidence for the Continuity of Early problem Behaviours: Application of a Developmental Model. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998;26:441–454. doi: 10.1023/A:1022647717926. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campbell SB. Behaviour Problems in Preschool Children: A review of recent research. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994;36:113–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01657.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bindman J, Glover G, Goldberg D, Chisholm D. Expenditure on mental health care by English health authorities: a potential cause of inequity. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:267–274. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.3.267. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources