Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):66-9.
doi: 10.4293/108680810X12674612014662.

Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement

Affiliations

Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement

Gustavo Lopes et al. JSLS. 2010 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most common way of placing a feeding tube. Sometimes PEG cannot be used to safely place a feeding tube, most commonly secondary to an inability to transilluminate the abdominal wall. Whereas open gastrostomy was previously necessary in such cases, laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (LAPEG) is a viable option and is reviewed here.

Methods: All patients referred for surgical feeding tube placement after unsuccessful PEG were considered for LAPEG. A diagnostic laparoscopy was performed to identify the reason for the failed PEG attempt. Additional ports were placed as needed for the retraction of organs and lysis of adhesions. The stomach was visualized, and the PEG was placed.

Results: Eight patients who underwent an unsuccessful PEG were taken to the operating room for LAPEG. All patients had successful LAPEG placement. No postoperative complications occurred. The most common reason identified for failed PEG attempt was adhesions followed by overlying organs. Average OR time was 32 minutes.

Conclusion: When conventional PEG placement is not possible, LAPEG placement should be considered as a time efficient, minimally invasive alternative to open gastrostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
White arrow on stomach. Black arrow on overriding colon with hematoma from previous percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy attempt.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Direct visualization of needle into stomach.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Approximation of gastric and abdominal walls.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gauderer M, Ponsky J, Izant R. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:872–875 - PubMed
    1. Gauderer M. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-20 years later: a historical perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(1):217–219 - PubMed
    1. Prosser B. Common issues in PEG tubes-what every fellow should know. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(6):970–972 - PubMed
    1. Denzer U, Mergener K, Kanzler S, et al. Mini-laparoscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(3):434–438 - PubMed
    1. Potack J, Chokhavatia S. Complications of and controversies associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: report of a case and literature review. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(6):142. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources