Risks of propofol sedation/anesthesia for imaging studies in pediatric research: eight years of experience in a clinical research center
- PMID: 20530306
- PMCID: PMC3197223
- DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.75
Risks of propofol sedation/anesthesia for imaging studies in pediatric research: eight years of experience in a clinical research center
Abstract
Objectives: To quantify the incidence of adverse events associated with anesthesia given for research-driven imaging studies and to identify risk factors for those events in pediatric research subjects.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.
Participants: Children and adolescents enrolled in clinical research protocols who required anesthesia for research-related imaging studies from January 2000 to September 2008.
Intervention: Propofol sedation/anesthesia.
Main outcome measure: The occurrence of respiratory, cardiovascular, and all anesthesia-related adverse events that required intervention while receiving anesthetics for research-driven imaging studies and other noninvasive procedures.
Results: We identified 607 children who received 1480 propofol anesthetic procedures for imaging studies. Seventy percent of anesthetics were given to subjects with severe diseases and significant disabilities (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status [ASA] III). Anesthesia had a mean (SD) duration of 115 (55) minutes, and in 12.5% of procedures, an airway device was necessary. There were 98 notable respiratory, cardiovascular, and other events in 79 anesthetic procedures, a rate of 534 per 10 000 anesthetic procedures with 1 or more adverse events. There was no long-lasting morbidity or mortality. The ASA classification (odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-6.88), anesthetic effect duration (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.70), and presence of airway abnormalities (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.60-12.12) were independently associated with adverse events during anesthetic use.
Conclusion: In our clinical research sample of high-risk children who received sedation/anesthesia by an anesthesiologist, we observed a low incidence of adverse events and no long-term complications. Risk factors for adverse events included higher ASA classification, increasing anesthetic duration, and presence of airway abnormalities.
Comment in
-
Weighing the risks and benefits of pediatric research: a risky business.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Jun;164(6):579-81. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.58. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010. PMID: 20530311 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):795-804. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334. Anesth Analg. 2009. PMID: 19224786
-
Procedural sedation for diagnostic imaging in children by pediatric hospitalists using propofol: analysis of the nature, frequency, and predictors of adverse events and interventions.J Pediatr. 2012 May;160(5):801-806.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 16. J Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22177990
-
Sedation for magnetic resonance imaging using propofol with or without ketamine at induction in pediatrics-A prospective randomized double-blinded study.Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Mar;28(3):264-274. doi: 10.1111/pan.13315. Epub 2018 Jan 27. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018. PMID: 29377404 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Propofol and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation/Anesthesia in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):979-992. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004967. Anesth Analg. 2021. PMID: 32665470
-
Patient-Controlled Versus Clinician-Controlled Sedation With Propofol: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analyses.Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):873-880. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003361. Anesth Analg. 2018. PMID: 29750696
Cited by
-
Sedation/anaesthesia in paediatric radiology.Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1018-31. doi: 10.1259/bjr/28871143. Epub 2012 Aug 16. Br J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22898157 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department - An Observational Study: Does Nil Per Os Status Matter?West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):200-209. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18561. West J Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40145912 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Cardiac MRI Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation Lesions for Pediatric Ventricular Arrhythmia: Feasibility and Clinical Correlation.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 May;28(5):517-522. doi: 10.1111/jce.13197. Epub 2017 Mar 28. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 28245348 Free PMC article.
-
Anesthesia outcomes in lysosomal disorders: CLN3 and GM1 gangliosidosis.Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Mar;191(3):711-717. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63064. Epub 2022 Dec 2. Am J Med Genet A. 2023. PMID: 36461157 Free PMC article.
-
Safety Assessment of Sedation Services in Radiology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Peshawar.Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1882-1884. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9326. Pak J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39281225 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Department of Health and Human Services. Additional protection for children involved as subjects in research. 45 CFR §46.401-46.409.
-
- Field MJ, Behrman RE, editors. Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004. - PubMed
-
- Shah S, Whittle A, Wilfond B, Gensler G, Wendler D. How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? JAMA. 2004;291(4):476–482. - PubMed
-
- Wendler D, Belsky L, Thompson KM, Emanuel EJ. Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit. JAMA. 2005;294(7):826–832. - PubMed
-
- Cravero JP. Risk and safety of pediatric sedation/anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(4):509–513. - PubMed