Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Jul;31(14):1690-700.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq213. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

Dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking echocardiography and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study

Hidekazu Tanaka  1 , Hans-Joachim Nesser, Thomas Buck, Olusegun Oyenuga, Rolf Alexander Jánosi, Siegmund Winter, Samir Saba, John Gorcsan 3rd
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking echocardiography and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study

Hidekazu Tanaka et al. Eur Heart J. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: The Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study used a prospective multi-centre design to test the hypothesis that speckle-tracking echocardiography can predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods and results: We studied 132 consecutive CRT patients with class III and IV heart failure, ejection fraction (EF) < or =35%, and QRS > or =120 ms from three international centres. Baseline dyssynchrony was evaluated by four speckle tracking strain methods; radial, circumferential, transverse, and longitudinal (> or =130 ms opposing wall delay for each). Pre-specified outcome variables were EF response and three serious long-term events: death, transplant, or left ventricular assist device. Of 120 patients (91%) with baseline dyssynchrony data, both short-axis radial strain and transverse strain from apical views were associated with favourable EF response 7 +/- 4 months and long-term outcome over 3.5 years (P < 0.01). Radial strain had the highest sensitivity at 86% for predicting EF response with a specificity of 67%. Serious long-term unfavourable events occurred in 20 patients after CRT, and happened three times more frequently in those who lacked baseline radial or transverse dyssynchrony than in patients with dyssynchrony (P < 0.01). Patients who lacked both radial and transverse dyssynchrony had unfavourable clinical events occur in 53%, in contrast to events occurring in 12% if baseline dyssynchrony was present (P < 0.01). Circumferential and longitudinal strains predicted response when dyssynchrony was detected, but failed to identify dyssynchrony in one-third of patients who responded to CRT.

Conclusion: Dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking echocardiography using radial and transverse strains is associated with EF response and long-term outcome following CRT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of speckle-tracking dyssynchrony analysis from mid-ventricular short-axis views demonstrating radial (A) and circumferential (B) time–strain curves in a heart failure patient with left bundle-branch block. Dyssynchrony is shown as a time difference (arrow) between time to peak strain in the anterior septum (orange curve) and posterior wall peak strain (green curve). ECG, electrocardiogram; Ant-sep, anterior septum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of speckle-tracking dyssynchrony analysis from an apical four-chamber view demonstrating transverse (A) and longitudinal (B) time–strain curves in a heart failure patient with left bundle-branch block. Dyssynchrony is shown as a maximum opposing wall delay (arrow) in time-to-peak strain among three apical views; four-chamber, two-chamber, and long-axis. ECG, electrocardiogram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Feasibility of speckle-tracking dyssynchrony analysis in consecutive patients with attempted echocardiograms. CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; LV, left ventricular.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bar graphs of ejection fraction (EF) values before and 7 ± 4 months after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with and without significant radial and transverse dyssynchrony. Both radial and transverse dyssynchrony were associated with significant improvement in EF after CRT.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of speckle-tracking strain approaches to dyssynchrony for predicting outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. (A) Ejection fraction (EF) response ≥15% and (B) event-free survival (freedom from death, transplant, or left ventricular assist device). Radial and transverse strain dyssynchrony were successfully predictive of response to CRT; however, circumferential and longitudinal strains were not. The combination of radial and transverse dyssynchrony was the most predictive of EF response and long-term outcome following CRT.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan–Meier curves of probability of freedom from death, transplant, or left ventricular assist device after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Baseline radial and transverse dyssynchrony ≥130 ms were associated with a significantly more favourable outcome.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Kaplan–Meier curves of probability of freedom from death, transplant, or left ventricular assist device after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Neither circumferential nor longitudinal dyssynchrony was associated with outcome.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Bar graph of per cent of patients with serious unfavourable events of death, heart transplant, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Patients with dyssynchrony identified by all speckle-tracking strain approaches had a low adverse event rate. Patients who had dyssynchrony excluded by radial or transverse strain had a significantly higher per cent of unfavourable events, in particular when combined.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA, 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hammill SC, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Newby LK, Page RL, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO, Smith SC, Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, Ornato JP, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:e1–e62. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, Kocovic DZ, Packer M, Clavell AL, Hayes DL, Ellestad M, Trupp RJ, Underwood J, Pickering F, Truex C, McAtee P, Messenger J. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1845–1853. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013168. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S, Garrigue S, Lavergne T, Cazeau S, McKenna W, Fitzgerald M, Deharo JC, Alonso C, Walker S, Braunschweig F, Bailleul C, Daubert JC. Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:111–118. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01932-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–2150. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032423. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–1549. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050496. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types