Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;40(2):127-37.
doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9197-1.

Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions

Suzanne C O'Neill  1 , Colleen M McBride, Sharon Hensley Alford, Kimberly A Kaphingst
Affiliations

Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions

Suzanne C O'Neill et al. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Increased availability of genetic risk information may lead the public to give precedence to genetic causation over behavioral/environmental factors, decreasing motivation for behavior change. Few population-based data inform these concerns. We assess the association of family history, behavioral risks, and causal attributions for diseases and the perceived value of pursuing information emphasizing health habits or genes. 1,959 healthy adults completed a survey that assessed behavioral risk factors, family history, causal attributions of eight diseases, and health information preferences. Participants' causal beliefs favored health behaviors over genetics. Interest in behavioral information was higher than in genetic information. As behavioral risk factors increased, inclination toward genetic explanations increased; interest in how health habits affect disease risk decreased. Those at greatest need for behavior change may hold attributions that diminish interest in information for behavior change. Enhancing understanding of gene-environment influences could be explored to increase engagement with health information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical Model and Hypothesized Effects
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Feero WG, Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. The genome gets personal--almost. JAMA. 2008;299:1351–1352. - PubMed
    1. Goddard KA, Robitaille J, Dowling NF, et al. Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12:92–104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461:747–753. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gollust SE, Hull SC, Wilfond BS. Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing. JAMA. 2002;288:1762–1767. - PubMed
    1. Khoury MJ, Bradley LA. Why should genomic medicine become more evidence-based? Genomic Med. 2007;1:91–93. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types