Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;15(6):689-99.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0619-2.

Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study

Affiliations

Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study

A A Choté et al. Matern Child Health J. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Despite compulsory health insurance in Europe, ethnic differences in access to health care exist. The objective of this study is to investigate how ethnic differences between Dutch and non-Dutch women with respect to late entry into antenatal care provided by community midwifes can be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Data were obtained from the Generation R Study. The Generation R Study is a multi-ethnic population-based prospective cohort study conducted in the city of Rotterdam. In total, 2,093 pregnant women with a Dutch, Moroccan, Turkish, Cape Verdean, Antillean, Surinamese Creole and Surinamese Hindustani background were included in this study. We examined whether ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry could be explained by need, predisposing and enabling factors. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent role of explanatory variables in the timing of antenatal care entry. The main outcome measure was late entry into antenatal care (gestational age at first visit after 14 weeks). With the exception of Surinamese-Hindustani women, the percentage of mothers entering antenatal care late was higher in all non-Dutch compared to Dutch mothers. We could explain differences between Turkish (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.57-1.58), Cape Verdean (OR = 1.65. CI: 0.96-2.82) and Dutch women. Other differences diminished but remained significant (Moroccan: OR = 1,74, CI: 1.07-2.85; Dutch Antillean OR 1.80, CI: 1.04-3.13). We found that non-Dutch mothers were more likely to enter antenatal care later than Dutch mothers. Because we are unable to explain fully the differences regarding Moroccan, Surinamese-Creole and Antillean women, future research should focus on differences between 1st and 2nd generation migrants, as well as on language barriers that may hinder access to adequate information about the Dutch obstetric system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Gestational age at intake according to ethnic background

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Conrad JK, Hollenbach KA, Fullerton JT, Feigelson HS. Use of prenatal services by hispanic women in San Diego County: A comparison of urban and rural settings. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1998;43(2):90–96. doi: 10.1016/S0091-2182(97)00155-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pagnini D, Reichman NE. Psychosocial factors and the timing of prenatal care among women in New Jersey’s HealthStart program. Family Planning Perspectives. 2000;32(2):56–64. doi: 10.2307/2648213. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frisbie WP, Echevarria S, Hummer RA. Prenatal care utilization among non-Hispanic whites, African Americans, and Mexican Americans. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2001;5(1):21–33. doi: 10.1023/A:1011393717603. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kupek E, Petrou S, Vause S, Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. BJOG. 2002;109:265–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00524.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowe RE, Garcia J. Social class, ethnicity and attendances for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2003;25(2):113–119. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg025. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types