Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Jan;37(1):5-10.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01114.x.

Incidence and prevention of early childhood caries in one- and two-parent families

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Incidence and prevention of early childhood caries in one- and two-parent families

K Plutzer et al. Child Care Health Dev. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Since the mid-1990s, there has been an increase in early childhood caries (ECC) in Australia and an increase in children living in one-parent families.

Objective: To examine whether single parenthood (mother only) affects the effectiveness of an oral health promotion programme to prevent ECC in their child.

Methods: First-time mothers were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of anticipatory guidance to prevent ECC. The intervention was applied during pregnancy and when the child was 6 and 12 months old. Mothers in the control group received no intervention. The presence of ECC was assessed at 20 months of age and compared between children from one- and two-parent families.

Results: Of 649 women enrolled, 441 brought their child for dental assessment. Eighty-seven (19.7%) had a one-parent family. Children from one-parent families had a 2.3 times higher incidence of ECC than children from two-parent families. The intervention reduced the frequency of ECC from 8.1% to 1.1% in two-parent families (relative risk: 0.14) and from 16.3% to 4.5% (relative risk: 0.28) in one-parent families. One case of ECC was prevented for every nine single mothers receiving anticipatory guidance compared with one case per 15 partnered mothers. Despite a greater reduction in the absolute risk of ECC in children from one-parent families, the intervention reduced their ECC experience only 3.5-fold compared with sevenfold in children from two-parent families.

Conclusion: The intervention produced a greater reduction in the frequency of ECC in children from one-parent families than in those from two-parent families. This did not reduce their disadvantage, though, as they still had a four times higher risk than children from two-parent families. Mothers and children in one-parent families need substantially more attention and support than those in two-parent families to eliminate their disadvantage in suffering ECC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources