Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Nov;27(11):2446-50.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq143. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

Strong purifying selection at genes escaping X chromosome inactivation

Chungoo Park  1 , Laura Carrel, Kateryna D Makova
Affiliations

Strong purifying selection at genes escaping X chromosome inactivation

Chungoo Park et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

To achieve dosage balance of X-linked genes between mammalian males and females, one female X chromosome becomes inactivated. However, approximately 15% of genes on this inactivated chromosome escape X chromosome inactivation (XCI). Here, using a chromosome-wide analysis of primate X-linked orthologs, we test a hypothesis that such genes evolve under a unique selective pressure. We find that escape genes are subject to stronger purifying selection than inactivated genes and that positive selection does not significantly affect the evolution of these genes. The strength of selection does not differ between escape genes with similar versus different expression levels in males versus females. Intriguingly, escape genes possessing Y homologs evolve under the strongest purifying selection. We also found evidence of stronger conservation in gene expression levels in escape than inactivated genes. We hypothesize that divergence in function and expression between X and Y gametologs is driving such strong purifying selection for escape genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>IG</sc>. 1.
FIG. 1.
A comparison of KA/KS ratios among escape, heterogeneous, and inactivated human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous genes. (A) All orthologs. (B) Orthologs located in the X-added region (XAR). (C) Orthologs located in the XCR. (D) All orthologs excluding genes with positively selected codons. (E) Orthologs located in XAR excluding genes with positively selected codons. (F) Orthologs located in XCR excluding genes with positively selected codons. The number of genes considered is given below each plot. In the box plots, edges and vertical dashed lines represent quartiles and range, respectively. Notches indicate standard deviations of the median. Outliers are not shown.
F<sc>IG</sc>. 2.
FIG. 2.
A comparison of KA/KS ratios among escape genes with Y homologs, escape genes without Y homologs, heterogeneous genes, and inactivated genes (as computed for the human–chimpanzee–macaque orthologous trios). The number of genes considered is listed below each plot.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bondy CA. Turner's syndrome and X chromosome-based differences in disease susceptibility. Gend Med. 2006;3:18–30. - PubMed
    1. Burgoyne PS. Mammalian sex determination: thumbs down for zinc finger? Nature. 1989;342:860–862. - PubMed
    1. Carrel L, Willard HF. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature. 2005;434:400–404. - PubMed
    1. Ellegren H, Parsch J. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:689–698. - PubMed
    1. Ellison JW, Wardak Z, Young MF, Gehron Robey P, Laig-Webster M, Chiong W. PHOG, a candidate gene for involvement in the short stature of Turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:1341–1347. - PubMed

Publication types