Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;19(8):1163-70.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9681-x. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods

Joan E Broderick  1 , Stefan Schneider, Joseph E Schwartz, Arthur A Stone
Affiliations

Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods

Joan E Broderick et al. Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the impact of different reporting period lengths on the accuracy of items measuring interference due to pain and fatigue with work, walking, and relations with others.

Methods: Six items from well-established instruments (Brief Pain Inventory, Brief Fatigue Inventory, SF-36) were investigated in a prospective study of 117 patients with chronic rheumatological illness. Daily ratings were compared with recall ratings of 1, 3, 7, and 28-day reporting periods.

Results: The level of recall ratings (RRs) for reporting periods of 3 days or more were significantly higher than the level of aggregated end-of-day (EOD) ratings. Correspondence between aggregated EOD and RRs was good (r ≥ .80) regardless of the length of the reporting period. Ratings of interference for a single day were highly correlated with aggregated EOD for up to 14 days prior to the single rating (r ≥ .76).

Conclusions: Recall ratings with reporting periods of up to a month yield good correspondence with aggregated daily ratings, although the absolute level of the rating will be inflated for recall periods of 3 days or longer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean end-of-day ratings and recall ratings of pain interference (left panel) and fatigue interference (right panel) with (a) walking, (b) work, and (c) social activities. Error bars represent standard errors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlations of recall ratings with the average of end-of-day ratings for pain interference and fatigue interference items.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Morrissey M, Johnson BA, Wendt JK, et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer. 1999;85(5):1186–1196. - PubMed
    1. Daut RL, Cleeland CS. The prevalence and severity of pain in cancer. Cancer. 1982;50(9):1913–1918. - PubMed
    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993;85(5):365–376. - PubMed
    1. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual & Interpretive Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
    1. Kerns R, Turk D, Rudy T. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Pain. 1985;23:345–356. - PubMed

Publication types