Physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
- PMID: 20535717
- PMCID: PMC3337764
Physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Abstract
Background: Information is limited regarding the knowledge and attitudes of physicians typically involved in the referral of patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.
Methods: We conducted a survey of primary care physicians and cardiologists at the University of Rochester Medical Center and the Unity Health System Rochester, NY from December 2008 to February 2009. The survey collected information regarding physicians' knowledge of and attitudes towards ICD therapy.
Results: Of the 332 surveys distributed, 110 (33%) were returned. Over-all 94 (87%) physicians reported referring patients for ICD implantation. Eighteen (17%) physicians reported unawareness of guidelines for ICD use. Sixty-four (59%) physicians recommended ICD in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 35%. Sixty-five (62%) physicians use < or = 35% as the LVEF criterion for ICD referral in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Cardiologists were more familiar than primary care physicians with LVEF criteria for implantation of ICD in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (p value 0.005 and 0.002, respectively). Twenty-nine (27%) participants were unsure regarding the benefits of ICDs in eligible women and blacks. Eighty two (76%) physicians believed that an ICD could benefit patients > or = 70 years old, whereas only 53 (49%) indicated that an ICD would benefit patients > or = 80.
Conclusions: A lack of familiarity with current clinical guidelines regarding ICD implantation exists. Primary care physicians are less aware of clinical guidelines than are cardiologists. This finding highlights the need to improve the dissemination of guidelines to primary care physicians in an effort to improve ICD utilization.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Questionnaire survey of cardiologists' knowledge, attitudes, and guideline application of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):672-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03373.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22452348
-
Referring physicians' discordance with the primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator guidelines: a national survey.Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jun;9(6):874-81. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.01.029. Epub 2012 Feb 2. Heart Rhythm. 2012. PMID: 22306794 Free PMC article.
-
Awareness of indications for device therapy among a broad range of physicians: a survey study.Europace. 2014 Nov;16(11):1580-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut416. Epub 2014 Jan 22. Europace. 2014. PMID: 24451291
-
Decision-making regarding primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among older adults.Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/clc.23315. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Clin Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31867773 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The need to modify patient selection to improve the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.Europace. 2013 Dec;15(12):1693-701. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut228. Epub 2013 Aug 14. Europace. 2013. PMID: 23946316 Review.
Cited by
-
Physicians' knowledge and attitudes in Saudi Arabia regarding implantable cardiac defibrillators.J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr;30(2):108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 8. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29910581 Free PMC article.
-
Underutilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest.Cardiol Res. 2011 Feb;2(1):1-6. doi: 10.4021/cr13w. Epub 2011 Jan 20. Cardiol Res. 2011. PMID: 28348654 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention in Women.Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jan;9(1):e002630. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002630. Circ Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 26758365 Free PMC article.
-
Life-saving devices reach the end of life with heart failure.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.007. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012. PMID: 23217431 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A roadmap for evaluating the use and value of durable ventricular assist device therapy.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Jan;37(1):146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 23. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018. PMID: 28711453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O’Donnell CJ, Roger V, Rumsfeld J, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Hong Y. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2007 Update. A report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115:e69–e171. - PubMed
-
- Zheng ZJ, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Sudden Cardiac Death in the United States: 1989 to 1999. Circulation. 2001;104:2158–2163. - PubMed
-
- Zipes DP, Wellens HJ. Sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1998;98:2334–2351. - PubMed
-
- Lombardi G, Gallagher J, Gennis P. Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City: the Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study. JAMA. 1994;271:678–683. - PubMed
-
- Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, Levine JH, Saksena S, Waldo AL, Wilber D, Brown MW, Heo M. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary artery disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1933–1940. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical