Continuous versus bolus dosing of Furosemide for patients hospitalized for heart failure
- PMID: 20538132
- PMCID: PMC3900281
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.355
Continuous versus bolus dosing of Furosemide for patients hospitalized for heart failure
Abstract
Intravenous diuretics are the cornerstone of management for patients hospitalized for heart failure. Physiologic data suggest that intermittent high-dose furosemide promotes neurohormonal activation, which a slow continuous infusion might remediate. However, the limited clinical data comparing dosing schemes are confounded. This study was a randomized, open-label, single-center trial of twice-daily bolus injection versus continuous infusion furosemide in patients hospitalized with heart failure and volume overload. The primary outcome was change in creatinine from admission to hospital day 3 or discharge. Twenty-one patients were randomized to bolus injection and 20 patients to continuous infusion. Baseline characteristics were balanced between study arms except for gender, with a mean age of 60 +/- 15 years, a mean ejection fraction of 35 +/- 19%, and a mean creatinine level of 1.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dl. The mean doses of furosemide were similar between arms over the first 48 hours (162 +/- 48 and 162 +/- 52 mg/24 hours). None of the outcomes differed significantly between bolus and continuous dosing from admission to hospital day 3 or discharge (mean change in creatinine -0.02 vs 0.13 mg/dl, p = 0.18; urine output 5,113 vs 4,894 ml, p = 0.78; length of stay 8.8 vs 9.9 days, p = 0.69). All patients survived to discharge. In conclusion, there were no substantial differences between bolus injection and continuous infusion of equal doses of furosemide for the treatment of patients hospitalized with heart failure. Given the high prevalence of heart failure hospitalization and the disparate results of small studies regarding optimal dosing of loop diuretics to treat these patients, larger multicenter blinded studies are needed.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Continuous versus bolus intermittent loop diuretic infusion in acutely decompensated heart failure: a prospective randomized trial.Crit Care. 2014 Jun 28;18(3):R134. doi: 10.1186/cc13952. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 24974232 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Evaluation of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Dopamine: The ROPA-DOP Trial.JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Oct;6(10):859-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Aug 8. JACC Heart Fail. 2018. PMID: 30098962 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of admission oral diuretic dose on response to continuous versus bolus intravenous diuretics in acute heart failure: an analysis from diuretic optimization strategies in acute heart failure.Am Heart J. 2012 Dec;164(6):862-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Oct 29. Am Heart J. 2012. PMID: 23194486 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous infusion vs. intermittent bolus injection of furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Anaesthesia. 2018 Feb;73(2):238-247. doi: 10.1111/anae.14038. Epub 2017 Sep 22. Anaesthesia. 2018. PMID: 28940440
-
Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses of Furosemide in Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Card Fail. 2020 Sep;26(9):786-793. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.11.013. Epub 2019 Nov 12. J Card Fail. 2020. PMID: 31730917
Cited by
-
Subcutaneous furosemide in heart failure: a systematic review.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Feb 8;11(1):94-104. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae083. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025. PMID: 39520561 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Renal Effects of Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Bolus Dosing of IV Loop Diuretics in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88953. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88953. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40895968 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):797-805. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005419. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21366472 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Different Furosemide Regimens in the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 18;2022:4627826. doi: 10.1155/2022/4627826. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. PMID: 36035285 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous versus intermittent administration of furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Fail Rev. 2019 Jan;24(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9727-7. Heart Fail Rev. 2019. PMID: 30054781
References
-
- Adams KF, Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, Berkowitz RL, Galvao M, Horton DP. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) Am Heart J. 2005;149:209–216. - PubMed
-
- Shah MR, Stevenson LW. Searching for evidence: refractory questions in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2004;10:210–218. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical