Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;41(7):1485-8.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577338. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity

Ronald M Lazar et al. Stroke. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Most improvement from poststroke aphasia occurs within the first 3 months, but there remains unexplained variability in recovery. Recently, we reported a strong correlation between initial impairment and change scores in motor recovery at 90 days. We wanted to determine whether aphasia recovery (defined as a change from baseline to 90 days) shows a comparably strong correlation and whether the relation was similar to that in motor recovery.

Methods: Twenty-one stroke patients had aphasia scores on the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) obtained on stroke admission (WAB(initial)) and at 90 days (WAB(3 mo)). The relation between actual change (Delta) scores (defined as WAB(3 mo)- WAB(initial)) and WAB(initial) was calculated in multiple-regression analysis.

Results: Regression analysis demonstrated that WAB(initial) was highly correlated with DeltaWAB (R(2)=0.81, P<0.001) and that, in addition, the relation between WAB(initial) and DeltaWAB was proportional, such that patients recovered 0.73 of maximal potential recovery (WAB(maximum)-WAB(initial)).

Conclusions: We show that, like motor recovery, there is a highly predictable relation between aphasia recovery and initial impairment, which is also proportional in nature. The comparability of recovery from motor and language impairment suggests that common mechanisms may govern reduction of poststroke neurologic impairment across different functional domains and that they could be the focus of therapeutic intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The relationship between the achieved change score on the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) from baseline to follow-up at 90 days (Achieved ΔWAB) to the maximum possible change score (Potential ΔWAB) for patients receiving therapy, not receiving therapy, and unknown therapy status, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals are displayed above and below. The equation for the curve is y = 1.11x + 1.6834.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Robey RR. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Feb;41(1):172–187. - PubMed
    1. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(2):163–182. - PubMed
    1. Lazar RM, Antoniello D. Variability in recovery from aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008 Nov;8(6):497–502. - PubMed
    1. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):64–71. - PubMed
    1. Lazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 May;79(5):530–534. - PubMed

Publication types