Conspiracy theories in science
- PMID: 20539311
- PMCID: PMC2897118
- DOI: 10.1038/embor.2010.84
Conspiracy theories in science
Abstract
Although few conspiracy theories target the natural sciences, they can have severe effects on public health or environmental policies. Ted Goertzel explains how scientists could help to prevent and mitigate potentially harmful conspiracy theories.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Baker P, Slevin P (2005) Bush remarks on ‘intelligent design' theory fuel debate. The Washington Post 3 Aug
-
- Broder J (2010) Scientists taking steps to defend work on climate. The New York Times 2 Mar
-
- Burgess D, Burgess M, Leasak J (2006) The MMR vaccination and autism controversy in United Kingdom 1998–2005: inevitable community outrage or a failure of risk communication? Vaccine 24: 3921–3928 - PubMed
-
- Coady D (2006) Conspiracy Theories: the Philosophical Debate. Farnham, UK: Ashgate
-
- Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources