Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays
- PMID: 20543024
- PMCID: PMC2917507
- DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/09-0075)
Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays
Abstract
Purpose: To differentiate the effect of phonotactic probability from that of neighborhood density on a vocabulary probe administered to preschool children with or without phonological delays.
Method: Twenty preschool children with functional phonological delays and 34 preschool children with typical language development completed a 121-item vocabulary probe in both an expressive and receptive response format. Words on the vocabulary probe orthogonally varied on phonotactic probability and neighborhood density but were matched on age of acquisition, word frequency, word length, semantic set size, concreteness, familiarity, and imagability.
Results: Results show a Phonotactic Probability x Neighborhood Density interaction with variation across groups. Specifically, the optimal conditions for typically developing children were rare phonotactic probability with sparse neighborhoods and common phonotactic probability with dense neighborhoods. In contrast, only rare phonotactic probability with sparse neighborhoods was optimal for children with phonological delays.
Conclusions: Rare sound sequences and sparse neighborhoods may facilitate triggering of word learning for typically developing children and children with phonological delays. In contrast, common sound sequences and dense neighborhoods may facilitate configuration and engagement for typically developing children but not for children with phonological delays because of their weaker phonological and/or lexical representations.
Similar articles
-
Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.J Commun Disord. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):105-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 18. J Commun Disord. 2010. PMID: 20004908 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Mar-Apr;48(2):188-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00198.x. Epub 2012 Nov 9. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013. PMID: 23472958 Free PMC article.
-
The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Oct;47(5):1194-212. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/088). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004. PMID: 15603471
-
The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Dec;58(6):1773-9. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0079. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 26540310
-
Speech Error Variability and Phonological Awareness in Preschoolers.Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jan 11;32(1):246-263. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00031. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023. PMID: 36580542 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Orthography and Modality Influence Speech Production in Adults and Children.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Dec 1;59(6):1421-1435. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0242. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016. PMID: 27942710 Free PMC article.
-
Grammar in Boys With Idiopathic Autism Spectrum Disorder and Boys With Fragile X Syndrome Plus Autism Spectrum Disorder.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Apr 17;61(4):857-869. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0248. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018. PMID: 29541769 Free PMC article.
-
Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Oct;55(5):1289-300. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0095). Epub 2012 Mar 12. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22411280 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of phonetic complexity on stuttered speech.Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Jul;26(7):646-59. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.682696. Clin Linguist Phon. 2012. PMID: 22690719 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Misarticulations on Children's Word Identification and Processing.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Apr 17;61(4):820-836. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0379. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018. PMID: 29554214 Free PMC article.
References
-
- ASHA Guidelines for screening for hearing impairment-preschool children, 3-5 years. Asha. 1997;4:IV-74cc–IV-74ee.
-
- Brownell R. Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test - 3rd edition. Academic Therapy Publications; Novato, CA: 2000a.
-
- Brownell R. Receptive one-word picture vocabulary test - 2nd edition. Academic Therapy Publications; Novato, CA: 2000b.
-
- Campbell T, Dollaghan C, Needleman H, Janosky J. Reducing bias in language assessment: Processing-dependent measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 1997;40:519–525. - PubMed
-
- Carroll JB, White MN. Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1973;12:563–576.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources