Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;89(9):959-64.
doi: 10.1177/0022034510371280. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Trend of income-related inequality of child oral health in Australia

Affiliations

Trend of income-related inequality of child oral health in Australia

L G Do et al. J Dent Res. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

It is important that we monitor socio-economic inequality in health. Inequality in child oral health has been expected to widen because of widening socio-economic inequality. This study aimed to evaluate trends in income-related inequality in caries experience of Australian children. Cross-sectional studies in 1992/93 and 2002/03 collected data on deciduous caries experience of 5- to 10-year-olds and permanent caries experience of 6- to 12-year-olds. Household composition and income was used to calculate quartiles of equivalized income. Slope Index of Inequality (SII), Concentration Index (CI), and regression-based rate ratios were used to quantify income-related inequality and to evaluate trends. Income-related inequality in caries experience was evident regardless of time and dentition. The three indicators of inequality indicate a significant increase in income-related inequality in child deciduous caries experience during the decade. The income inequality in permanent caries experience did not change significantly. Income inequalities increased in deciduous teeth, but not in permanent teeth, among Australian children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Dental caries experience by income and time. (a) Age- and sex-adjusted mean dmfs scores by quartiles of equivalized household income in the 1992/93 and 2002/03 studies. (b) Age- and sex-adjusted mean DMFS scores by quartiles of equivalized household income in the 1992/93 and 2002/03 studies. For both (a) and (b), quartiles of equivalized income: 1, lowest; 4, highest.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Concentration curves by time and dentition. (a) Concentration curve for deciduous caries experience in 1992/93. (b) Concentration curve for deciduous caries experience in 2002/03. (c) Concentration curve for permanent caries experience in 1992/93. (d) Concentration curve for permanent caries experience in 2002/03. aNegative Concentration Index (CI) reflects higher caries level among lower income children. bPercentage redistribution required from the highest to the lowest group to make estimated income-related inequality equal to zero (Koolman and van Doorslaer, 2004).

References

    1. AIHW (2007). Profile of nutritional status of children and adolescents. Cat. No. PHE 89 Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
    1. Antunes JL, Jahn GM, de Camargo MA. (2005). Increasing inequalities in the distribution of dental caries in the Brazilian context in Finland. Community Dent Health 22:94-100 - PubMed
    1. Blakely T, Tobias M, Atkinson J. (2008). Inequalities in mortality during and after restructuring of the New Zealand economy: repeated cohort studies. BMJ 336:371-375 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng NF, Han PZ, Gansky SA. (2008). Methods and software for estimating health disparities: the case of children’s oral health. Am J Epidemiol 168:906-914 - PMC - PubMed
    1. DHHS (2000). Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services

Publication types