Methodology of antiemetic trials: a review
- PMID: 2054311
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057871
Methodology of antiemetic trials: a review
Abstract
Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting can be controlled with available antiemetics in a high percentage of patients, while emesis remains a critical problem in some subgroups and with certain drugs. In the ceaseless attempt to find newer drugs and better treatment modalities, a sound methodology in antiemetic research is essential. Several factors should always be considered when planning an antiemetic trial: first, the different emetic power of various chemotherapy agents, their dosages and route and schedule of administration and second, the type of antiemetic used, its dosage and timing, and its possible combination with other antiemetics. Important factors which influence outcome but which are often under-evaluated are those related to patient population such as age, gender, and previous experience with chemotherapy. Considering the relevance of subjective phenomena in nausea and vomiting, it is essential that any study be randomized and double blinded. The parallel type of study design is preferable to the cross-over and a large number of patients is usually required to achieve meaningful results. Efficacy and toxicity should be properly evaluated by trained personnel in a standardized way, using a validated, relatively simple methodology.
Similar articles
-
Methodology of antiemetic trials: response assessment, evaluation of new agents and definition of chemotherapy emetogenicity.Support Care Cancer. 1998 May;6(3):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s005200050157. Support Care Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9629873 Review.
-
Problems in antiemetic trial design and interpretation.Oncology (Williston Park). 1989 Aug;3(8 Suppl):5-10. Oncology (Williston Park). 1989. PMID: 2701576 Review.
-
Methodology of trials with antiemetics.Support Care Cancer. 1996 Jul;4(4):281-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01358880. Support Care Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8829305 Review.
-
Are more antiemetic trials with a placebo necessary? Report of patient data from randomized trials of placebo antiemetics with cisplatin.Cancer. 1996 Nov 15;78(10):2193-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19961115)78:10<2193::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-t. Cancer. 1996. PMID: 8918414
-
[Methodology of the evaluation of antiemetics].Bull Cancer. 1995 Dec;82(12):1062-6. Bull Cancer. 1995. PMID: 8745674 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Combination antiemetic therapy with aprepitant/fosaprepitant in patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the SENRI trial: analysis of risk factors for vomiting and nausea.Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;22(1):88-95. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-1022-9. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27465476 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of intensive antiemetic therapy including olanzapine in multiple myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation.Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 11;33(9):777. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09839-2. Support Care Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40788411 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of risk factors predictive of nausea and vomiting with current standard-of-care antiemetic treatment: analysis of two phase III trials of aprepitant in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2010 Sep;18(9):1171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0737-9. Epub 2009 Sep 12. Support Care Cancer. 2010. PMID: 19756774 Clinical Trial.
-
Are there differences among the serotonin antagonists?Support Care Cancer. 1994 Sep;2(5):293-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00365580. Support Care Cancer. 1994. PMID: 8000725 Review.
-
Optimizing antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japan: Update summary of the 2015 Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis.Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;26(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01818-3. Epub 2020 Nov 8. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33161452 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical