Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;12(4):154-9.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.58338.

Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study

Prashant Monga  1 , Vivek Sharma, Sukesh Kumar
Affiliations

Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study

Prashant Monga et al. J Conserv Dent. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Aim/objective: To evaluate the in vitro effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth.

Materials and methods: One hundred twenty extracted, maxillary, permanent premolars were collected. After preparing the access cavity, the teeth were biomechanically prepared and obturated. Samples were divided into six groups based on the type of restorative material used to restore them. Teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and their fracture strength was measured using a Universal Testing Machine. Data were evaluated statistically using one-way ANOVA-F and unpaired t-test.

Results: Teeth restored with bonded amalgam and composite resin showed higher fracture resistance than those restored with conventional amalgam. Fracture strengths of bonded restorations and intact teeth were not statistically different. The results suggested that the group restored with conventional amalgam had the lowest fracture resistance. No statistically significant differences were found between the bonded amalgam and composite resin groups.

Conclusion: Conventional amalgam core showed the least fracture resistance whereas; composite resin and bonded amalgam core showed fracture resistance was similar to that of natural tooth.

Keywords: Bonded restorations; fracture resistance; root-filled teeth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root filled teeth: Comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J. 2006;39:136–42. - PubMed
    1. Hürmüzlü F, Serper A, Siso SH, Er K. In vitro fracture resistance of root filled teeth using new generation dentine bonding adhesives. Int Endod J. 2003;36:770–3. - PubMed
    1. Daneshkazemi AR. Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004;5:51–8. - PubMed
    1. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part 11: Strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:114–22. - PubMed
    1. Siso SH, Hürmüzlü F, Turgut M, Altundaşar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Int Endod J. 2007;40:161–8. - PubMed