Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;17(1):28-37.
doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.61214.

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: indications, surgical techniques and complications

Affiliations

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: indications, surgical techniques and complications

Farid Karimian et al. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

The concept of lamellar keratoplasty (LK) is not new. However, it had been abandoned and largely replaced by the time-honored technique of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) because LK is technically demanding, time consuming and gives suboptimal visual outcomes due to interface irregularity arising from manual lamellar dissection. Recent improvements in surgical instruments and introduction of new techniques of maximum depth of corneal dissection as well as inherent advantages such as preservation of globe integrity and elimination of endothelial graft rejection have resulted in a re-introduction of LK as an acceptable alternative to conventional PK. This review article describes the indications, different techniques, clinical outcomes and complications of deep anterior LK.

Keywords: Anwar's Big-bubble Technique; Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty; Lamellar Keratoplasty; Melles'Technique; Penetrating Keratoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Air injection deep into the stroma with a bevel-down 27-G needle; (b) Round big-bubble formation passing the trephination borders; (c) Formed big-bubble; (d) Exposed Descemet's membrane after removal of the corneal stroma; (e) Removal of donor Descemet's membrane; (f) Conclusion of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with the combined suturing technique
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pseudo-anterior chamber formation due to microperforation of the Descemet's membrane
Figure 3
Figure 3
Iris stromal atrophy following managed post-operative pupillary block
Figure 4
Figure 4
Interface wrinkling following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty
Figure 5
Figure 5
Vascularization of the interface with protein extravasations and opacification
Figure 6
Figure 6
Suture-induced reaction, cheese-wiring and loose sutures after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, Bunce C, Craig E. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1676–82. - PubMed
    1. Watson SL, Tuft SJ, Dart JK. Patterns of rejection after deep lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:556–60. - PubMed
    1. Terry MA. The evolution of lamellar grafting techniques over twenty-five years. Cornea. 2000;19:611–6. - PubMed
    1. Morris E, Kirwan JF, Sujatha S, Rostron CK. Corneal endothelial specular microscopy following deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue. Eye. 1998;12:619–22. - PubMed
    1. Panda A, Bageshwar LM, Ray M, Singh JP, Kumar A. Deep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesions. Cornea. 1999;18:172–5. - PubMed