Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren
- PMID: 20543995
- PMCID: PMC2882432
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000289
Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between preterm delivery and increased risk of special educational need (SEN). The aim of our study was to examine the risk of SEN across the full range of gestation.
Methods and findings: We conducted a population-based, retrospective study by linking school census data on the 407,503 eligible school-aged children resident in 19 Scottish Local Authority areas (total population 3.8 million) to their routine birth data. SEN was recorded in 17,784 (4.9%) children; 1,565 (8.4%) of those born preterm and 16,219 (4.7%) of those born at term. The risk of SEN increased across the whole range of gestation from 40 to 24 wk: 37-39 wk adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.20; 33-36 wk adjusted OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43-1.63; 28-32 wk adjusted OR 2.66, 95% CI 2.38-2.97; 24-27 wk adjusted OR 6.92, 95% CI 5.58-8.58. There was no interaction between elective versus spontaneous delivery. Overall, gestation at delivery accounted for 10% of the adjusted population attributable fraction of SEN. Because of their high frequency, early term deliveries (37-39 wk) accounted for 5.5% of cases of SEN compared with preterm deliveries (<37 wk), which accounted for only 3.6% of cases.
Conclusions: Gestation at delivery had a strong, dose-dependent relationship with SEN that was apparent across the whole range of gestation. Because early term delivery is more common than preterm delivery, the former accounts for a higher percentage of SEN cases. Our findings have important implications for clinical practice in relation to the timing of elective delivery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Comment in
-
Early term, preterm and post-term gestation births increase the risk of special educational needs during schooling.Evid Based Ment Health. 2011 Feb;14(1):11. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.14.1.11. Evid Based Ment Health. 2011. PMID: 21266608 No abstract available.
References
-
- Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJS. Cognitive and behavioural outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm. JAMA. 2002;288:728–737. - PubMed
-
- Anderson PJ, Doyle LW. Cognitive and educational deficits in children born extremely preterm. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32:51–58. - PubMed
-
- Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, Russell R, Bettegowda VR, et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among US singleton births; impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992–2002. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:8–15. - PubMed
-
- Cole SK. Scottish maternity and neonatal records. In: Chalmers I, McIlwaine GM, editors. Perinatal audit and surveillance. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1980. pp. 39–51.
-
- Campbell S, Soothill PW. Detection and management of intra-uterine growth retardation: a British approach. In: Chervenak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbell S, editors. Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology. Volume 2. Boston: Little Brown; 1993. pp. 1432–1435.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
