'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy
- PMID: 20544008
- PMCID: PMC2882313
- DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z
'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy
Abstract
We examined effects of proposer gender and condom negotiation strategy on perceptions of condom proposers in undergraduates in the southwestern regions of the US. Using a video manipulation (N=150), a female proposer was evaluated no more harshly than a male proposer, and was evaluated more positively in some ways. In a vignette manipulation (N=193) a female proposer using an Eroticization negotiation strategy (compared to Refusal of sex or Explanation of consequences) was seen as more exciting and likely to engage in sex. Surprisingly, women were harsher judges than men of a female condom proposer using an Eroticization strategy. Greater attention should be paid to the nature of condom negotiation within the framework of the sexual script.
Similar articles
-
[Analysis on condom use negotiation with sex partners and condom use in female sex workers].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 10;40(7):795-799. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.07.012. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31357801 Chinese.
-
Gender differences related to heterosexual condom use: the influence of negotiation styles.J Sex Marital Ther. 1999 Jul-Sep;25(3):217-25. doi: 10.1080/00926239908403996. J Sex Marital Ther. 1999. PMID: 10407794
-
Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Feb;100(2):309-29. doi: 10.1037/a0022152. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21171789
-
Condom negotiation: findings and future directions.J Sex Res. 2015;52(4):470-83. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.868861. Epub 2014 Mar 26. J Sex Res. 2015. PMID: 24670110 Review.
-
[Current status of the female condom in Africa].Sante. 1997 Nov-Dec;7(6):405-15. Sante. 1997. PMID: 9503499 Review. French.
Cited by
-
First impressions of HIV risk: it takes only milliseconds to scan a stranger.PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030460. Epub 2012 Jan 24. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22291959 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Question of Love and Trust? The Role of Relationship Factors in Adolescent Sexual Decision Making.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015 Oct;36(8):628-34. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000190. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 26114614 Free PMC article.
-
Reframing Sexual Health for Black Girls and Women in HIV/STI Prevention Work: Highlighting the Role of Identity and Interpersonal Relationships.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12088. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212088. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34831855 Free PMC article.
-
An expanded model of the temporal stability of condom use intentions: gender-specific predictors among high-risk adolescents.Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9266-0. Ann Behav Med. 2011. PMID: 21347619 Free PMC article.
-
Condom negotiation and use among female sex workers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia.AIDS Behav. 2013 Feb;17(2):612-22. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0369-9. AIDS Behav. 2013. PMID: 23196858 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen M, Emmers-Sommer TM, Crowell TL. Couples negotiating safer sex behaviors: A meta-analysis of the impact of conversation and gender. In: Allen M, Preiss RW, Gayle BM, Burrell NA, editors. Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2002. pp. 263–279.
-
- Altermatt TW, DeWall CN, Leskinen E. Agency and virtue: Dimensions underlying subgroups of women. Sex Roles. 2003;49:631–641.
-
- Aubrey JS. Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles. 2004;50:505–514.
-
- Barash DP, Lipton JE. The myth of monogamy. New York: Freeman; 2001.
-
- Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;71:230–244. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources