Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;58(8):791-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00106-010-2091-0.

[Analysis of spinal stress during surgery in otolaryngology]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Analysis of spinal stress during surgery in otolaryngology]

[Article in German]
M Wunderlich et al. HNO. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Back pain is a common cause of sick leave in industrialized countries. Performing surgery is often associated with considerable cervical spine disorders. However, only a few studies have examined to what extent working posture or individual surgical techniques can be seen as stress indicators.

Material and methods: Posture and movement of the spine and trunk were assessed by means of a newly developed analysis system (3-D-SMG). The individual-case study was carried out during six sinus operations using varying techniques (microscope, endoscope or headlamp only).

Results: Spine and trunk deviation from neutral position (upright standing) was strongest in the sagittal plane. Awkward distortions were primarily observed in the cervical and lumbar spine. The analysis of work characteristics revealed static postures in 65-90% of sinus operations. Isometric positions were mainly related to microscopic surgery.

Conclusions: The data from this explorative individual-case study indicate that prevalence and magnitude of forced isometric and awkward postures are strongly associated with work-related spinal stress in sinus surgery. The new measurement device enables not only the recommendation of individual preventive strategies but also the objective evaluation of ergonomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Otolaryngol. 2005 Oct;34(5):333-40 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(3):240-5 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1999 Sep;134(9):1011-6 - PubMed
    1. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985 Dec;60(6):615-23 - PubMed
    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Aug;42(8):959-68 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources