Airborne diazinon concentrations during and after outdoor spray application
- PMID: 20544468
- DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2010.486699
Airborne diazinon concentrations during and after outdoor spray application
Abstract
Airborne concentrations of the organophosphate pesticide diazinon were assessed using personal sampling on an applicator and area sampling at several locations within ornamental plant beds sprayed with the chemical. As part of field work testing a prototype pesticide monitor, diazinon was applied to azalea bushes, from a backpack sprayer, on two separate occasions. Personal and area sampling was used to measure concentrations during the application and over multiple time scales after the initial sampling. The area measurements indicated that diazinon concentrations during and immediately after application were similar to the consensus occupational exposure limit (OEL) of 10 mug/m(3) for airborne diazinon. Concentrations measured from personal samples worn by the applicator were 57-82% of the occupational limit during the application period. Therefore, an applicator and anyone else near ornamental plants being sprayed with diazinon should use personal protective equipment, including appropriate respiratory protection. Concentrations declined substantially with time during the subsequent 24-hr period. In 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set the restricted-entry interval (REI) after diazinon is applied to ornamental plants to 2 days, assuming only dermal exposures are relevant after spraying. However, the results of this study suggest that the health risks posed by estimated potential doses caused by inhalation exposures after spraying are of the same order of magnitude as the risks posed by potential dermal doses using the risk assessment methodology employed by EPA. Thus, EPA should not dismiss inhalation exposures when developing REIs for diazinon in the future.
Similar articles
-
Concentrations of diazinon, chlorpyrifos, and bendiocarb after application in offices.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990 Jan;51(1):23-7. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369277. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990. PMID: 1689096
-
Assessing isocyanate exposures in polyurethane industry sectors using biological and air monitoring methods.Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Aug;50(6):609-21. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel024. Epub 2006 May 26. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006. PMID: 16731584
-
Worker exposure and a risk assessment of malathion and fenthion used in the control of Mediterranean fruit fly in South Australia.Environ Res. 2007 Jan;103(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Aug 17. Environ Res. 2007. PMID: 16914134
-
A comparison and critique of historical and current exposure assessment methods for beryllium: implications for evaluating risk of chronic beryllium disease.Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 May;16(5):593-614. doi: 10.1080/10473220119613. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001. PMID: 11370938 Review.
-
Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.J Environ Monit. 2004 May;6(5):404-12. doi: 10.1039/b314697a. Epub 2004 Mar 11. J Environ Monit. 2004. PMID: 15152307 Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying wastewater chemicals in coastal aerosols.Sci Adv. 2025 May 30;11(22):eads9476. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ads9476. Epub 2025 May 28. Sci Adv. 2025. PMID: 40435233 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials