Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;25(2):271-88.
doi: 10.1037/a0019106.

Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults

Affiliations

Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults

Melissa L Finucane et al. Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

The authors evaluated the reliability and validity of a tool for measuring older adults' decision-making competence (DMC). A sample of 205 younger adults (25-45 years), 208 young-older adults (65-74 years), and 198 old-older adults (75-97 years) made judgments and decisions related to health, finance, and nutrition. Reliable indices of comprehension, dimension weighting, and cognitive reflection were developed. Comparison of the performance of old-older and young-older adults was possible in this study, unlike previous research. As hypothesized, old-older adults performed more poorly than young-older adults; both groups of older adults performed more poorly than younger adults. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that a large amount of variance in decision performance across age groups (including mean trends) could be accounted for by social variables, health measures, basic cognitive skills, attitudinal measures, and numeracy. Structural equation modeling revealed significant pathways from 3 exogenous latent factors (crystallized intelligence, other cognitive abilities, and age) to the endogenous DMC latent factor. Further research is needed to validate the meaning of performance on these tasks for real-life decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example comprehension problem with (a) literal and (b) inferential questions. The correct answer for (a) is Brand D and for (b) is Brand B.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example consistency problem presenting unordered information (the second presentation shows the same information ordered by gross return).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example dimension-weighting problem.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean difficulty (proportion correct) for comprehension, dimension-weighting, and cognitive-reflection items for each age group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Structural equation model of relationships between basic cognitive abilities, decision style, age, and decision-making competence.

References

    1. Adams C, Smith MC, Nyquist L, Perlmutter M. Adult age-group differences in recall for the literal and interpretive meanings of narrative text. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 1997;4:187–195. - PubMed
    1. Allaire JC, Marsiske M. Everyday cognition: Age and intellectual ability correlates. Psychology and Aging. 1999;14:627–644. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988;319:1635–1638. - PubMed
    1. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Frank E, O’Donnell S, Kupfer D. Competence of depressed patients for consent to research. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156(9):1380–1384. - PubMed
    1. Artistico D, Cervone D, Pezzuti L. Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults. Psychology and Aging. 2003;18:68–79. - PubMed

Publication types