Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun 14:10:336.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-336.

A worksite prevention program for construction workers: design of a randomized controlled trial

Karen M Oude Hengel  1 , Catelijne I Joling, Karin I Proper, Birgitte M Blatter, Paulien M Bongers
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A worksite prevention program for construction workers: design of a randomized controlled trial

Karen M Oude Hengel et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: A worksite prevention program was developed to promote the work ability of construction workers and thereby prolong a healthy working life. The objective of this paper is to present the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of that intervention program compared with usual care for construction workers.

Methods: The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a follow-up of one year. Employees eligible for this study are construction workers performing actual construction work. The worksite intervention will be compared with usual care. This intervention was developed by using the Intervention Mapping approach and consists of the following components: (1) two individual training sessions of a physical therapist to lower the physical workload, (2) a Rest-Break tool to improve the balance between work and recovery, and (3) two empowerment training sessions to increase the influence of the construction workers at the worksite. Outcome measures are assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome measures of this study are work ability and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcome measures include need for recovery, musculoskeletal complaints, work engagement and self efficacy. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated from the company perspective. Moreover, a process evaluation will be conducted.

Discussion: The feasibility of the intervention and the study has been enhanced by creating an intervention program that explicitly appeals to construction workers and will not interfere too much with the ongoing construction. The feasibility and effectiveness of this worksite prevention program will be investigated by means of an effect- and a process evaluation. If proven effective, this worksite prevention program can be implemented on a larger scale within the construction industry.

Trial registration: NTR1278.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the intervention program.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Welch LS. Improving work ability in construction workers--let's get to work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:321–324. - PubMed
    1. Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S, editors. Dimension of work ability: results of the Health 2000 Survey. Helsinki: Finnish Centre of Pensions, The Social Insurance Institution, National Public Health Institute, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2008.
    1. Ilmarinen J. Work ability--a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35:1–5. - PubMed
    1. Ilmarinen J. Ageing workers in the European Union - Status and promotion of work ability, employability and employment. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Ministry of Social Affaire and Health, Ministry of Labour; 1999.
    1. van den Berg TI, Elders LA, de Zwart BC, Burdorf A. The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:211–220. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.039883. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types