Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Jun;34(3):287-9.

Productivity of needle localization to facilitate excision of nonpalpable, mammographically suspicious lesions

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2054762

Productivity of needle localization to facilitate excision of nonpalpable, mammographically suspicious lesions

G Higgins et al. Can J Surg. 1991 Jun.

Abstract

The use of needle localization to aid excisional biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions is now common, and the literature suggests that 13% to 33% of such lesions are malignant. During the 4 years from 1984 to 1988, all women who underwent fine-needle localization in preparation for biopsy were studied to identify factors that might facilitate the selection of those more likely to harbour a cancer, thus sparing patients with benign disease operative intervention. In all, 124 biopsies were performed on nonpalpable lesions that were suspicious on mammography; 51 lesions were malignant and 73 benign. The average age of the patients was 56 years (55 years for those with benign lesions and 61 for those with malignant lesions). The family history, history of breast disease, symptoms and calcification seen on mammography were not significantly different between the two groups. Only 25% of the malignant lesions were noninvasive. In 10% of the patients who had invasive lesions there was lymph-node involvement. The rate of malignancy in this patient population (41%) was slightly better than that reported in the literature, and a larger proportion of patients had noninvasive disease. The authors conclude that none of the above-mentioned risk factors could be used in the preoperative selection of patients for open biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources